TAX SERVICES

FIRS Issues Public Notice On Taxability Of Certain Compensation Payments

Summary On 14 August 2019, the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) issued a Public Notice (PN) on deduction of tax at source from compensations paid to agents by principal companies. The PN directs companies to deduct and remit Withholding Tax (WHT) and Value Added Tax (VAT) on compensations such as commissions and rebates, which are due to their distributors and customers. Details According to the FIRS, the issuance of the PN is aimed at providing guidance to the public and in particular, taxpayers and advisers on WHT and VAT, which is deductible from the compensations or commissions due to distributors, agents and customers. In the PN, the FIRS stated that compensations and commissions earned by distributors/dealers are to be subjected to VAT and WHT. According to the PN, its position is based on its Information Circular No. 2006/02 issued in February, 2006 and the Companies Income Tax Act (Rates, Etc. Deduction at Source (Withholding Tax) Regulations. The FIRS, however, stated that a number of companies have failed to deduct WHT and VAT from such compensations and commissions. The PN, further requires companies (specifically those in the Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Sector) to apply WHT and VAT on any compensation due to their distributors and customers. The FIRS stated that the duty to deduct and remit WHT or VAT will not be affected by the mode of payment (i.e. cash, credit notes, goods-in-trade or any other means payable). Based on the PN, such WHT/VAT must be charged at the appropriate rate and remitted to the FIRS on or before the 21st of every month. The FIRS further stated that it will commence the monitoring of compliance on relevant companies/transactions. Implication This PN implies that companies are to subject all forms of compensation payments including commissions and rebates granted to dealers, agents, distributors and general customers to WHT and VAT and remit same to the FIRS. The PN has some far-reaching implications especially for companies in the FMCG sector. The FIRS’ directive to companies to deduct VAT at source is not in line with the express provisions of the VAT Act. Except for transactions with non-resident companies or transactions with companies in the oil and gas sector, companies are not ordinarily required to deduct VAT at source under the existing VAT Act. Moreover, the applicability of VAT on rebates and discounts issued to distributors and customers remains a contentious issue given that they do not necessarily constitute income/revenue in the hands of the companies that enjoy it. Thus, the requirement to account for VAT and WHT on compensation payments and sales-incentives is unclear because giving a blanket directive without specifics as to the practical application of VAT and WHT on such category of transaction simply creates more ambiguities. Based on the above, we expect the FIRS to issue further guidance to provide additional clarity on the PN. Taxpayers are however advised to seek professional advice in order to review their existing business arrangements to ensure compliance with the provisions of the tax laws.   Source: Mondaq

FIRS Issues Public Notice On Taxability Of Certain Compensation Payments Read More »

Multiple tax collectors, defaulters and auditors

The people of Jericho held Zacchaeus, the corrupt chief tax collector, in low esteem. The biblical story had it that when Jesus was passing through Jericho, the very short Zacchaeus had to climb a tree to catch a glimpse of him. People grumbled and looked at him with scorn. If they had their way, they would have pulled him down from that tree. Many Nigerians still see Zacchaeus in our modern-day tax collectors. Be they agents of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), state Inland Revenue Service or even local government thugs, these tax collectors have a way of harassing corporate and private individuals over tax issues. Last week, for instance, the FIRS released a list of 19,901 companies that allegedly defaulted in tax payment. Some of the defaulters include Obasanjo Farms, owned by former President Olusegun Obasanjo; Davido Music Worldwide Ltd, owned by popular musician, David Adeleke; God is Good Motors; Slot Enterprises; and popular supermarket chain, Addide. The FIRS placed the accounts of these companies under lien. It threatened that, should they fail, refuse or neglect to pay the tax due within 30 days of the notice, it would proceed and enforce the payment against all the directors, managers, secretaries and every other person concerned in the management of the companies. For many of these companies, part of the problem is that they are confronted with up to 50 different taxes and levies in Nigeria. The Federal Government collects such taxes as companies’ income tax, education tax, and value added tax. States collect such taxes and levies as personal income tax, withholding tax (individuals only), capital gains tax (individuals only), and stamp duties on instruments executed by individuals. There are also pools betting and lotteries, gaming and casino taxes, road taxes, business premises registration fees in respect of urban and rural areas, land use charge, consumption tax (hotels, restaurants and event centres) and many others. The local governments, on their part, collect such taxes and levies as tenement rate, right of occupancy, market taxes and levies, merriment and road closure levy, marriage, birth and death registration fees and many others. Multiple taxes have crippled operations of a lot of companies in Nigeria. In some cases, tax collectors reportedly compel companies that recorded losses to pay taxes from their turnover. Besides, the high rate of withholding tax charged on dividends reportedly scares many companies from listing their shares on the stock exchange. Fewer than 200 companies are listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange, whereas the country can boast of over 2,000 registered public companies. Little wonder Nigeria ranks low on the world ease of doing business index. No doubt, tax is a good source of revenue for government. Hence, some people saddled with the responsibility of collecting it, like the executive chairman of the FIRS, Mr. Babatunde Fowler, will not agree that there is anything like multiple taxes in Nigeria. They think more on how to generate better income from taxation and less on accountability and proper utilisation of the tax proceeds. That is why the recent action of the Chief of Staff to the President, Abba Kyari, is commendable. Kyari queried Fowler over alleged discrepancies in tax collections from 2015 to 2018. In 2015, for instance, the budgeted target was N4.5 trillion, while the actual amount collected was N3.7 trillion. In 2016, the actual collection was N3.307 trillion, whereas what was budgeted was N4.95 trillion. In 2017 and 2018, the FIRS collected N4.027 trillion and N5.32 trillion, respectively. However, the budgeted targets for the two years were N4.89 trillion and N6.7 trillion, respectively. Kyari’s query raised suspicions in some quarters. The opposition Peoples Democratic Party, for instance, urged the National Assembly “to come to the rescue by holding a public inquest into the handling of taxes collected by the FIRS in the last four years, take urgent steps to recover the stolen funds and channel such to projects that have direct bearing on the welfare of Nigerians.” To clarify issues, the Presidency quickly issued a statement. Fowler, it said, was not under any probe. The letter from Kyari, it explained, merely raised concerns over the negative run of the tax revenue collection in recent times. Nevertheless, the Federal Government announced plans to audit FIRS and Customs’ revenues. These two agencies are money-spinners. Perhaps, the government suspects that to whom much is given, much could also be stolen. In Abuja, Lagos and some other places, people talk in hushed tones about how money realised from taxes is allegedly diverted. It is expected that the Office of the Auditor-General of the Federation, which will likely conduct this audit, will do a good job of it. My only fear is that nothing much would come out of it. Recently, the Auditor-General of the Federation (AuGF), Anthony Ayine, indicted many government agencies for not submitting their audited accounts to his office. Ayine also accused the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) and Solid Minerals Ministry of poor/non-disclosure of receipts. In an audit report, the AuGF said, as at April 2018, 109 agencies had not submitted beyond 2013; 76 agencies last submitted for the 2010 financial year, while 65 agencies have never submitted any account since inception. Besides, the AuGF reported errors in the amounts included as the Federal Government’s share of VAT for 2016.  The sum of N108,997,999,612.48 was recorded as Federal Government’s share of VAT without the full picture of the VAT earnings to the federation. From the auditor’s account, what was due the Federal Government from January to December 2016 was N116,783,571,013.35.  This posted a difference of N7,785,571,400.87. The Accountant-General of the Federation could not provide explanations for this difference at the time of the audit report. Despite concerns raised by the AuGF, nothing much was done to sanction defaulting agencies and parastatals.   Source:  Sun News

Multiple tax collectors, defaulters and auditors Read More »

Outrage as government makes N60b from new equity tax regime

With the resumption of Value Added Tax (VAT) collection from stock market transactions, investors will return at least N60.11 billion into government coffers in one year. The move, however, has drawn criticism from some stakeholders who said it would amount to double taxation. The Federal Government had in 2014 granted a tax holiday on all stock market transactions, a deliberate attempt at reducing the high cost of transaction in the market and making it more attractive to investors.On the expiration of the tax exemption on July 24, 2019, dealing members were mandated to charge VAT on all commissions applicable to capital market transactions with effect from July 25, 2019. The estimate, based on the N1.20 trillion total equity turnover of 2018, is in addition to the Withholding Tax (WHT) of 10 per cent applicable to dividend payments in Nigeria. The tax is deducted by the investee company before remittance of dividends to shareholders in line with Section 80 of the Companies Income Tax Act (CITA). Analysts, operators and investors however argued that the development is equivalent to multiple taxation; citing the withholding tax on dividend being collected by government and other charges paid to regulators. The stakeholders estimated that investors might lose about N2.47 billion yearly, especially with the listing of high cap stocks like MTN Communications and Airtel Africa, both of which have increased the capitalisation of the stock market.VAT is a tax on consumption especially of luxury items. Essentials like basic foodstuffs, healthcare and education are exempted. The Federal Government, meanwhile, has assured that it is tackling the issues of stamp duties collection and the extension of VAT exemption on capital market transactions. Vice President Yemi Osinbajo, at the Awards Night of the Association of Issuing Houses of Nigeria (AIHN) in Lagos recently, said these and other problems were being addressed and a resolution would be announced very soon. But the stakeholders insisted that urgent measures must be taken to forestall further loss of investment especially at a time investors’ confidence in the market has been eroded due to macroeconomic headwinds and other external factors.They said the return of VAT would further dampen investors’ appetite for stocks, trigger migration of investment to money market instruments, and deter foreign participation in stock market. They noted further that transaction cost in the Nigerian capital market is one of the highest in the world, saying this has made it difficult to attract global investors to the equity market, thus reducing its capacity to contribute meaningfully to capital formation in Nigeria.The managing director of Highcap Securities, Imafidon Adonri, said the elimination of VAT in 2014 was a deliberate action to reduce the high cost of transaction in the market, which was one of the major disincentives to investing. According to him, at the time government took the action, the capital market was already showing signs of fragility arising from economic distress. He posited that the return of VAT and contract stamp would continue to put equities at a competitive disadvantage. “At the twilight of the President Goodluck Jonathan administration, when the Nigerian economy was threatened with stagflation, the Federal Government suspended charging of VAT and contract stamp for transactions in the secondary market of the capital market. “The policy was a fiscal measure enunciated to reduce the cost of transaction, prevent capital flight, and make the Nigeria capital market attractive. It was to secure the capital market against the adverse consequences of a falling economy,” Adonri said.He continued: “Transaction cost in the Nigerian capital market is one of the highest in the world. Strangely, the capital market in Nigeria is an arena for fees to government, regulators and various operators, all loaded on the investors. “As a result, it is overcharged and globally uncompetitive. Huge transaction cost has made it difficult to attract global investors to the equities market, thus reducing its capacity to contribute meaningfully to capital formation in Nigeria.”He added: “For the equities market to flourish and contribute meaningfully to capital formation, withholding tax, VAT and contract stamp should be abolished from the capital market. Nigeria should stop subsidising consumption and also stop penalising investment through counter-productive taxation.” The head of research, FSL Securities, Victor Chiazor, said the reintroduction of the tax charge on market transactions was expected to cause some form of lethargy towards the already bearish market.“The tax exemption granted to the NSE in 2014 was done towards improving market participation and encouraging interest from the investing public, especially given that the market performance prior to that period had been largely bearish. “Going forward, the reintroduction of the tax charge on the market is expected to cause some form of lethargy towards the already bearish market as a few investors already complain of the high transaction charge on their stock market transaction. If this cost is added, it will further drive the cost of each transaction higher.   Source: Guardian

Outrage as government makes N60b from new equity tax regime Read More »

FIRS charges VAT on online transactions January 2020 —Fowler

The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) has said that it would start charging Value Added Tax on online transactions, both domestic and international, with effective from January 2020. The Executive Chairman of FIRS, Mr Tunde Fowler, disclosed this at the African Tax Administration Forum Technical Workshop on VAT on Monday in Abuja. Fowler said that a lot of countries in the world had identified Nigeria as a good market and many of them were into online businesses, adding that there was the need to tap the potentials to generate more revenue for the country. He, however, said that that the date of commencement of the VAT on online transactions would be subject to government’s approval.  “We have thrown it out to Nigerians. Effective from January 2020, we will ask banks to charge VAT on online transactions, both domestic and international. “VAT remains the cash cow in most African countries, with an average VAT-to-total tax revenue rate of 31 per cent. This is higher than the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development’s average of 20 per cent. “This statistics, therefore, is a validation of the need for us to streamline the administration of this tax with the full knowledge of its potential contributions to national budgets. “It is, however, also bearing in mind the rights of our taxpayers,” he said. According to him, in Nigeria, for example, VAT is critical to the development of projects at all levels of government. “VAT revenue is shared 15 per cent to the Federal Government, 50 per cent to state governments and 35 per cent to local governments. “FIRS wrote to all commercial banks in May 2018, requesting for a list of companies, partnerships and enterprises with a banking turnover of N1 billion and above. “This activity is aimed at ascertaining those companies that are compliant with the tax laws and those that are not,” he said. Fowler, who is also the chairman of ATAF, said that the African tax outlook gave some starting points on the questions to ask regarding some aspects of VAT.   Source: Punch

FIRS charges VAT on online transactions January 2020 —Fowler Read More »

How FIRS, other agencies miss revenue targets

Experts List Ways To Rev Up National Revenue Aside observed economic challenges, the failing strategies deployed by the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) in the collection of tax revenue is leaving billions of naira out of government coffers, thereby shorting the country’s revenue budgets. Furthermore, other revenue generating agencies like ministries of Finance; Industry, Trade and Investments, as well as that of Budget and National Planning are increasingly tardy with reports of financial dealings, remittances of revenue, and avoidance of accountability. The nation’s tax authorities should, however, learn not to overstate facts, as it appears that tax expectations are not actually based on agreed liabilities, but estimated liabilities, which create false hopes and mostly result in disputes with associated costs to government. Meanwhile, tax and financial experts have proffered ways of ending the ongoing financial malfeasance, loss of revenue through leakages, lack of proper financial reporting and how to increase collections and remittances. The latest report of the Auditor-General of the Federation (AuGF), Anthony Ayine, which pointed out several infractions amounting to hundreds of billions, also spotted eight major ones in the Ministry of Budget and National Planning; 11 in the Ministry of Finance; four in the Ministry of Trade and Investment, and huge uncollected tax revenues by FIRS, all of which amounted to hundreds of billions of naira and creating dire fiscal crisis. The report also deplored the level of financial recklessness perpetrated by several government agencies, citing many violations of fiscal laws that have imprisonment and refunds as penalty. “As at April 2018, 109 agencies have not submitted financial reports beyond 2013, 76 agencies last submitted for the 2010 financial year, while 65 agencies have never submitted any account since inception,” the report said. In the Ministry of Budget and National Planning, N36.75m advances granted to some officers of the ministry were still not retired as at March 2017, with most of them granted amounts up to N4m and multiple advances without retiring the previous outstanding. “The above development is a contravention of extant regulations, which stipulates that advances in excess of N200, 000 should not be granted to any officer and that all procurement of stores and services costing above N200, 000 shall only be made through the award of contract by Local Purchase Orders (LPO), or Job Orders. “Non-compliance with this extant rule deprived government of revenue that would have been generated from VAT and WHT if contracts were awarded,” he said. About 42 payment vouchers with amounts totalling N30.93 million were raised and payments effected to members of staff and contractors for various services without relevant supporting documents, contrary to Financial Regulation 603(i). At the Budget Office of the Federation, about N4.96 billion was made available to the Budget Office of the Federation for Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) Fund, however there were no records maintained for the receipt and disbursement of this huge amount. “Accounting books such as Vote books and Cashbooks were not maintained. Payment vouchers were not even raised while making payments. The only information available was the memo to the Director of Expenditure requesting for the release of the amount from the schedule officer stating that a committee had been set up for the management of the fund. “This act contravenes Financial Regulations 405 and 406 which require the sub- accounting officer of the benefiting MDA to maintain an appropriate record and ensure that the amount on the AIE is not exceeded,” he said. Also, four MDAs were paid the sum of N19.09 billion from the Service Wide Vote without the approval of the Minister of Finance, some of which were made on a purported verbal directive from the Director- General, contravening the Financial Regulations 301 and 302 which state that “recurrent expenditure is paid from the Consolidated Revenue Fund and no expenditure may be incurred except on the authority of a warrant issued by the Minister of Finance”. Among the 11 major infractions of the Ministry of Finance include the N48 million paid through a payment voucher dated October 12, 2016, to Federation Accounts Allocations Committee (FAAC) Post Mortem Treasury Single Account(TSA) account being payment for re-appointment of Consultants to the Post Mortem Sub-committee of FAAC. The payment for the consultants was made to a Sub-committee of FAAC and not directly to the Consultants, while the identity of the Consultants was not disclosed and there was no evidence that due process was followed in the engagement of the Consultants. Furthermore, the mandatory 10 per cent Withholding Tax and five per cent Value Added Tax (VAT) worth N7.2 million was not deducted from the payment made to the four Consultants, contrary to VAT Act No. 102 of 1993 and Financial Regulation 234, which says failure to comply would result in sanctions, including fines and/or imprisonment. At the Ministry of Trade and Investment, 13 payment vouchers with amounts totalling N60.39 million were raised for payment of estacode and air tickets to members of staff of the Ministry. However, all the payment vouchers, which were raised after the journeys had been embarked upon were without relevant supporting documents, as required by Financial Regulation 603, while all the efforts to get the supporting documents did not yield result. Source: guardian

How FIRS, other agencies miss revenue targets Read More »

The dynamics of managing tax risk and controversy

Global tax risk and controversy are on the rise globally, especially for multinational enterprises (MNEs), and this is driven by a number of factors. The first part of this article is devoted to examining the general trends in the global tax landscape within which the MNEs operate in order to set the background. Later in the article, the various phases in the tax risk management process, and the tools available to manage risk under each phase are highlighted. The article then concludes by highlighting the risks created by tax controversy. First and foremost, businesses have become very dynamic, with transactions being structured in ways that were never envisaged at the time the tax laws were being enacted. We are now talking about e-business, digital economy, block-chain, robotics, to mention a few. All these developments present new challenges for Revenue Authorities, MNEs and their tax advisors alike.  Secondly, the global tax landscape is more volatile and contentious, hence causing more tax disputes and controversy. We have seen a plethora of tax reforms both in the United States and in the European Union coupled with the famous Brexit in the United Kingdom. All these developments have far-reaching ramifications for MNEs wherever they operate, including in the developing world.  Thirdly, Revenue Authorities around the world have become more aggressive and focussed on transactions taking place in their jurisdictions, especially by MNEs. The G20 countries as well as the member countries of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the Africa Tax Administration Forum (ATAF) have been at the forefront of driving this agenda. As the Ethiopians say, “The man that marries a beautiful wife, and the one that grows corn by the roadside, have the same problem”! The MNEs are the proverbial man that married a beautiful wife; every Revenue Authority wants to grab a share of what they perceive as income generated from its territory.  Fourthly, the rapid pace of tax law changes creates more tax risk and controversy since taxpayers find themselves always aiming at a moving target in their tax compliance agenda. In the wake of the finalisation of the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Project, many countries have embarked on a flurry of tax law changes, ranging from the traditional amendments to complete overhaul of tax laws. For example, Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania have in the past two or three financial years effected a number of amendments in their domestic tax laws; Rwanda, on the other hand, has taken a more radical approach in the past three years, issuing completely new Income Tax and Value Added Tax Laws as well as cancelling its Double Tax Treaty with Mauritius and negotiating an entirely new Treaty.  We are also witnessing increased information sharing among Revenue Authorities, presenting new challenges for multinational companies (MNEs). In the developed world, it is not uncommon for a multinational group to be handling a tax issue with the Tax Administration in one territory, only for follow-up queries on the same subject to be raised by the Tax Authority of another jurisdiction in which they operate. On the African continent, the Africa Tax Administration Forum (ATAF) is spearheading this. At the tail- end of July 2018, during my tour of duty in Rwanda, I was privileged to attend the ATAF High Level Tax Policy Dialogue that took place in Kigali. The subject of information sharing was high on the agenda; therefore, MNEs cannot afford to adopt a business-as-usual approach to their tax compliance agenda in Africa anymore.  Additionally, narrow tax bases in most of the developing countries mean that Revenue Authorities have become more unreasonable and aggressive in their approach and interpretation, especially when it comes to grey areas in the law as well as borderline cases, in order to meet increased tax revenue targets. For instance, Uganda Revenue Authority was tasked to collect about Sixteen Trillion Uganda Shillings last financial year; this has been raised to about Twenty Trillion for the current financial year. Hence, taxpayers should not expect to be faced with an overly reasonable taxman. As the Nigerian saying goes, “The frown on a goat’s face does not prevent it being taken to the market for sale”! In a nutshell, all the above trends imply that taxpayers and their business advisors must take a more holistic view of the tax legislative and regulatory environments within which they operate if they are to remain on top of their tax risk management agenda.     Source: New Vision

The dynamics of managing tax risk and controversy Read More »

Police arrest Tunisia presidential candidate Karoui for tax crime

Tunisian police arrested presidential candidate Nabil Karoui on Friday on what local media said were charges of financial crimes, but his party said it was a politically motivated attempt to exclude him from the election race. Karoui’s own Nessma TV channel reported he had been arrested as he traveled to Tunis and broadcast a video showing the police detaining him in his car. The 56-year-old media magnate is one of the main candidates contesting the Sept 15 election following the death of President Beji Caid Essebsi. A judge ordered the detention of Karoui to face charges of tax evasion and money laundering, Mosaique FM radio reported. Judicial authorities were not immediately available for comment. A judge decided in July this year to bar Karoui from traveling abroad after weeks of investigation on suspicion of money laundering. “The police arrested Karoui while we were on our way back from the city of Beja to Tunis,” said Osama Khelifi, a political adviser to the candidate. “They kidnapped the most prominent candidate in the presidential election so that (Prime Minister Youssef) Chahed can win the election in an open way,” he added. Samira Chaouachi, spokeswoman of Karoui’s Heart of Tunisia Party, said it was “a political arrest aimed at keeping Karoui out of the presidential race”. The prime minister’s office was not available for comment. Chahed and Karoui are among 26 candidates running for the presidency following Essebsi’s death last month aged 92. Esebsi was the first head of state to be democratically elected in Tunisia following the popular uprising of 2011. Other candidates include former president Moncef Marzouki and Abd El Fatteh Mourou vice president of the moderate Islamist Ennahda party. Tunisia’s president controls foreign and defense policy, governing alongside a prime minister chosen by parliament who has authority over domestic affairs. Karoui founded the Khalil Tounes Foundation in 2017 to fight poverty, the main theme in his campaign. Nesma channel promotes his candidacy and career. In April, police stormed the offices of Nesma and took it off the air over accusations that it had breached broadcasting rules. Nesma said it was a move to stop it criticizing the government.   Source: African Quarter

Police arrest Tunisia presidential candidate Karoui for tax crime Read More »

Crypto Taxation Around the Globe

Upon its inception, Bitcoin was envisioned as a borderless currency that could be used by its owners without being affected by the regulatory impositions of any centralized agency or government body. And while this idea in itself is quite grand, the fact of the matter is that today’s crypto owners (across the globe) are subject to varying tax restrictions on their digital holdings by local regulatory bodies. Also, over the course of the past few months, a number of tax agencies around the globe, (such as the United States Internal Revenue Service) have been in the process of creating new guidance frameworks for overseeing their respective crypto industries. For example, Japanese tax authorities have been sifting through data obtained from various local exchanges so as to nab evaders and cheats, while the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) is currently operating a number of investigations regarding tax-avoidance ploys that involve large volumes of digital currencies. These developments clearly point to the fact that crypto is a matter of concern for a number of tax departments around the world — primarily because they provide people with an avenue for commerce that expands beyond today’s existing financial systems. So, here are  some crypto-centric economic frameworks that are being used by countries across the globe.   Source: Sleekarena

Crypto Taxation Around the Globe Read More »

BMO Mocks Obasanjo Over Alleged Tax Default

Former President Olusegun Obasanjo has been mocked by the Buhari Media Organisation (BMO) for being indicted by the Federal Inland Revenue Service, FIRS, as a tax defaulter. Obasanjo Farms Nigeria Limited, a company owned by the former President was among the 19,000 tax defaulters recently listed by the FIRS. Through a statement issued by the Chairman, Niyi Akinsiju and Secretary, Cassidy Madueke, BMO said it was shocking that someone who prides himself as the father of modern Nigeria was a tax defaulter. The group told him that not only should he write open letters to Buhari on how to govern the nation, he should also pay his taxes when due. The statement by the BMO reads; It is a big surprise that a company owned by a former President who sees himself as the father of modern Nigeria is on a list of companies that have run afoul of the nations tax laws. We also consider it a thing of shame for General Obasanjo not to pay taxes as at when due, especially as he is known to pontificate either at public fora or through open letters against societal ills, aside from launching scathing attacks against all sitting Presidents after him. We do not see why he should stop writing letters or speaking out against societal ills, but it would be hypocritical for him not to pay his companys taxes as at when due. So, our message to former President Obasanjo is: Keep writing open letters to Nigerians but do not forget to pay your taxes, the BMO said.   Source: Xtreme news

BMO Mocks Obasanjo Over Alleged Tax Default Read More »

CAC updates registration for SMEs, others

In line with the ease of doing business policy, the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC), has made changes to the pre-incorporation and post-incorporation processes on its portal. In a statement culled from the Commission’s website, “users will now have an option to check for conflicting names before making a name reservation to reduce the number of denied name reservations and the attendant costs.” “Users will no longer be directed to the ‘Upload’ segment of the website but will now be prompted to upload signed incorporation documents as soon as the payment of filing fees and stamp duties are made. Certificates of Incorporation will now be printed by the accredited user. “The requirement for a valid Company email address is now mandatory as the Commission will communicate all future correspondences (including but not limited to the acknowledgment of post-incorporation filings) to the company via its registered email address. The procedure for making post-incorporation changes are as follows: When a company is incorporated, the portal sends a notification to the company’s registered email prompting it to create online profiles of accredited users who it intends to engage for purposes of its post-incorporation filings. “The Company enters details of the users and their email addresses. Once this is completed, the accredited user receives an email with login details, which grants them access to the portal to process post-incorporation filings on behalf of that Company. “Further, all CTC requests will now be made online and the CTCs printed by the user. All documents emanating from the Commission (Certificates of Incorporation and CTCs) will now bear an electronic certification stamp with a QR Code. The innovation of the QR Code enables any interested party with a smartphone to scan the code and confirm the authenticity of the document. “There has also been a slight change to the cost of obtaining CTCs of Annual Returns. Typically, a company pays N2,000 for CTC of the Annual Returns Form CAC 10, the Company’s Audited Accounts and CAC’s letter. Companies will now be required to pay N2,000 for each of these documents,” the statement read in part.   Source: The Sun

CAC updates registration for SMEs, others Read More »

Loading...