Tax news

Buhari orders agencies to work with new Joint Tax Board

President Muhammadu Buhari has directed all business data generating agencies in the country to furnish the Joint Tax Board (JTB) with all vital information necessary for its activities. This is as the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) plans to get 45 million Nigerians into the tax net by September. Vice President Yemi Osinbajo, who dropped the order yesterday in Abuja, listed the agencies concerned as Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC), Nigeria Customs Service (NCS), Nigeria Immigration Service (NIS), Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC), Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Nigeria Inter-Bank Settlement System (NIBSS), Nigeria Identity Management Commission (NIMC) and Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC). He disclosed this after launching the JTB for Tax Identification Number (TIN) Registration System. “All the agencies involved with generation of business data have been directed by the president to immediately collaborate with the JTB with the provision of necessary information to enable it capture accurate tax database of Nigeria. “This has become necessary because the new TIN registration system is in line with the Economic Recovery and Growth Plan (ERGP) of this administration. “There is a tendency that foreign investors would not have implicit confidence in your own economy, if the level of domestic investment is not encouraging. That is why the new TIN registration system has been introduced to help tax-payers and other stakeholders easily verify their TIN online. The service also enables tax-payers to print their TIN certificate or send it to their emails,” Prof. Osinbajo stated. Earlier, the JTB chairman, who is also chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), Babatunde Fowler, had declared that with the launch of the new TIN registration system, the service would, before the end of the third quarter, raise the tax base to 45 million. “We believe that with the new TIN registration system, we will be reinforcing the laudable efforts of this administration towards building a robust tax revenue administration system, promoting a tax-friendly environment and ensuring a sustainable and inclusive economy for all Nigerians. “During the first tenure of this government, we expanded the tax base from 10 million to 20 million with the potential for an increase to 45 million before the end of the third quarter of 2019,” Fowler said. According to him, for the first time in history, the federal government paid all outstanding Pay As You Earn (PAYE) tax liabilities owed by federal Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) from 2002 to 2016, totalling N135.8 billion to the various state governments. “We hope that this gesture will encourage state governments to also promptly remit all withholding taxes and Value Added Tax (VAT) due to the federation account.”   Source: Guardian

Buhari orders agencies to work with new Joint Tax Board Read More »

PECAN urges government to curb multiple taxation.

The Vice President, Pest Control Association of Nigeria (PECAN), Mr. James Erondu has said many of its members have been running their companies at a loss due to multiple taxation and extortion. He therefore appealed to the Lagos State government to call its tax agents to order and put an end to the extortion. Speaking yesterday at the one-day seminar to commemorate the Global World Pest Day, organised by the Ministry of Environment and Lagos State Environmental Protection Agency (LASEPA) in collaboration with Rotimax Integrated Services Limited, Erondu said it is the responsibility of government to create enabling environment for pest control companies to thrive, rather than extorting them. “If government addresses the issue of multiple taxation, it would go a long way in boosting the business of our members,” he said. Speaking at the event with the theme Recognising the importance of pest management in Protecting Public Health and the Environment, Erondu asked pest control practitioners who have not registered with the association to do so to avoid embarrassment, saying the association has decided to rid the industry of quackery. General Manager LASEPA, Engr. Ayodele Anthonio commended members of the association and assured them their welfare would be taken care of.   Source: Guardian

PECAN urges government to curb multiple taxation. Read More »

SEC lays out plans to leverage FIRS, NSE, and CAC in nailing Oando

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is planning to partner the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC), and the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE), over Oando Plc‘s alleged corporate infractions. The capital market regulator disclosed that it plans to share findings from Oando Plc’s forensic audit with other regulatory institutions in order for further actions to be taken. SEC,NSE,FIRS,CAC,Oando Plc, Oando’s forensic audit. SEC is referring to the alleged corporate infractions leveled against the oil and gas company that include –corporate governance lapses, insider abuse, internal control failure, and capital market abuse. The Plan: The capital market regulator will refer to the alleged violation involving the over-deduction of withholding tax on dividends paid to shareholders in 2014 to the FIRS. A statement from SEC disclosed the following. “There were several corporate governance lapses stemming from poor board oversight. These include irregular approval of directors’ remuneration, directors’ participation in matters in which they had declared interest, unjustified disbursements to directors and management of the company, and failure of the audit committee to hold meetings with management, internal auditors and external auditors. “Oando Plc deducted an amount representing 24 per cent of the dividend paid to shareholders in 2014 as withholding tax; this exceeded the statutory requirement of 10 percent as required by the Companies Income Tax Act. “Oando Plc failed to comply with several tax laws such as the Companies Income Tax Act and Value Added Tax Act, etc. These tax-related violations are being referred to the FIRS.” More so, SEC will refer to the issue of an alleged failure of internal control, issue arising from the sale of its subsidiary, as well as insider and suspected market abuse. to the NSE. “Oando Plc failed to establish an effective system of internal control as required under section 61 of the Investment and Securities Act 2007 over its financial reporting thereby compromising the integrity of the company’s financial controls and reporting as revealed by the misstatements in the financial statements, high number of related party transactions and unjustified disbursements to directors. “In 2013, Oando Plc reported the sale of its subsidiary, Oando Exploration and Production Limited to Green Park Management Limited without obtaining the approval of the commission in violation of the provisions of the Investment and Securities Act 2007 and the consent of the Minister of Petroleum as required under the Petroleum Act, 1969. “The purported sale of OEPL enabled Oando Plc to report a profit instead of a loss, thereby misstating its financial statement in 2013 and 2014 and consequently misleading investors. This ‘fictitious’ profit reported in 2013 enabled Oando Plc to declare dividends.” “The 2013 misstated accounts and quarterly reports of Oando Plc were included in the 2014 rights circular, thereby misrepresenting the financial status of the company to the public in violation of section 64 of the provisions of the ISA 2007. “In 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015, certain insiders of Oando Plc sold shares of the company during ‘closed periods’ despite having the knowledge of active closed periods by the company and contrary to the rules of the NSE.” On the issues to be recommended to the CAC for further action, the document said these included alleged false disclosures and non-disclosure of beneficial ownership. The Genesis: Oando Plc and SEC have been at loggerheads since the regulatory body released its investigation into the activities of the management of the company. SEC accused the management of market abuses and false disclosures, demanding the resignation of Tinubu, the Board chairman, and other executives and directors of the company. Source: Nairamatric

SEC lays out plans to leverage FIRS, NSE, and CAC in nailing Oando Read More »

VAT hike: PDP, CUPP berate Buhari over directive to govs

The Peoples Democratic Party and the Coalition of United Political Parties  on Saturday criticised President Muhammadu Buhari for asking the governors of the 36 states to increase Value Added Tax in the next four years. Buhari had, while inaugurating the National Economic Council for its 2019-2023 session at the Presidential Villa in Abuja, told the governors to raise their internally generated revenue and VAT in the next four years. He told the governors to increase the taxes in such a manner that there would be no disruptions to business operations. But the National Publicity Secretary of the PDP, Mr Kola Ologbondiyan, in an interview with our correspondent in Abuja, said VAT increment would further impoverish the already traumatised Nigerians. He urged Buhari to rather explore more revenue generation platforms by harnessing the abundant natural resources and investment opportunities in the country than inflicting more taxes on Nigerians. According to him, PDP will never support VAT increment. Ologbondiyan said, “How can we support VAT increment? It will further traumatise the people. We cannot support it. There are several opportunities for government to get money and deliver dividends of democracy to the people that have not been explored in this country. “What is the government doing about opening more frontiers for investments in our nation? It is not just going after the people and increasing taxation at the slightest opportunity. That is not governance. PDP can never support increase in VAT.” The CUPP spokesman, Mr Imo Ugochinyere, said it would be insensitive to increase VAT. He accused Buhari of not managing national resources at his disposal very well, adding that Buhari should close up all avenues for revenue leakages. According to him, VAT increase will collapse many businesses and worsen unemployment in the country. Ugochinyere said, “This matter came up during the election and we said clearly that the timing was wrong. It is the height of insensitivity. The little resources that have been available, the President has not shown judicious use of them. He has not taken control of the government. There has been a lot of waste. He still has about N2bn or N3bn for feeding in Aso Rock. “They should close all the loopholes that have been taking our money. He can save a lot. The economy is not stable for you to start taxing people the more. By doing that, more businesses will close and unemployment will increase. “This is not the right time to increase VAT. They should first of all stabilise the economy and secure the country.”   Source: Punch

VAT hike: PDP, CUPP berate Buhari over directive to govs Read More »

New JTB TIN Registration Will Bring Convenience, Transparency

Mr. Babatunde Fowler, Chairman, Joint Tax Board (JTB) and Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), explains to select journalists, how the new tax identification number registration system, scheduled for launch on Monday, will bring convenience to the taxpayer, boost tax compliance and revenue collection. Olaoluwakitan Babatunde was there There is a plan by the Joint Tax Board, which you chair, to introduce a new a New Tax Identification Number (TIN) Registration system. What is this about? We call it a new TIN Registration process and will be launched by the Vice President on 1 July. Before now, we have had people undergoing training on how to utilise this. And what this system basically does is to take information already in our system plus what we have in our national tax database. So once it is launched, we have to run it and have it come on the national database for the whole nation, both for companies and individuals. What this implies is that if you have a tax clearance in Kano State, for example, and you are coming to Lagos for transaction, instead of the man in Lagos confirming your tax clearance documents that you brought from Kano, he only needs to click the button and everything shows live. That is what the system does. The system brings innovation, convenience and transparency to tax authorities and taxpayers by enabling tax authorities efficiently manage their taxpayer base, while enabling taxpayers to view, retrieve and update their tax profiles at the comfort of their homes or offices. The new JTB TIN will be universal throughout the country and can be used by taxpayers to pay for any tax type. This reduces the burden of having to register for multiple TIN numbers from different tax authorities and states, as it lever ages on the biometrics we’ve got on BVN, from tax agencies, the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) and National Identity Management Commission (NIMC). So it brings in all onto a common platform. It also notifies taxpayer through a robust and secure system-to-system integration. What are the benefits to tax authorities? Clearly, the benefit would be convenience and transparency. If you are resident in one state and you go to transact business in another state, say, quote for a contract, it is in the law that part of the criteria is to have a tax clearance certificate. Immediately, an officer in the ministry will check if the individual name or your company name and your tax data are clearly are available. On the other side, if you have underpaid, like you paid a N100, 000 in Ogun State and you want to buy a property in Lagos for N10 million, the man clicks the button and asks how you can afford a N10 million property in Lagos based on the income on which you paid a tax of N100,000. So basically, it is a situation that is open and provides the taxpayer and the tax administrator with the same knowledge. So, it is not a matter of you trying to tell the tax official I pay adequate tax or for the tax official to demand inducement for tax clearance. How much trust can the taxpayer have in this new system and does it completely remove the need to physically visit tax offices? You don’t have to because we do all these things online. Now when you talk about trust, basically what the system does is to keep all your tax payments. And that currently operates in Lagos, which is one of the few states where it operates. Any payment in Lagos State, for example, over the last five years or six years, is available at the click of a button. This is what we have done with this new system.   So even for some states that do not have the capacity of the financial muscle to do it, we have put it all together in one place. So, once you key into that system, you have the same benefit as the taxpayer.   Source: This day

New JTB TIN Registration Will Bring Convenience, Transparency Read More »

Court orders Shell to pay $17.9 million to FIRS

A Federal High Court,in Lagos south west Nigeria,  Presided over  by Justice Chuka Obiozor, today  ordered four multinational Oil companies, namely Shell Nigeria Exploration and Production Company Limited, Esso Exploration and Production Nigeria( DEEPWATER) Limited, Nigeria Agip Exploration Limited, and Total E&P Nigeria Limited to pay a total sum of $17,900,484.80., as penalty  and interest respectively on the imposed education tax of $75,381,332.00. The judgement of the court was as as a result of appeal filed before the court by Federal Inland Revenue Service, FIRS, against the judgement of the Tax Appeal Tribunal that set aside the demand notice, including penalty and interest and ruled in favour the oil companies. Dissatisfied with the judgement of the tribunal, FIRS filed an appeal before the Federal High Court. In a notice of appeal filed and argued before the court, by  Ladipo Ojo, the appellant contended that FIRS issued a notice of assessment and serve it on Shell Petroleum Company, following which the company raised objection that the basis period used was incorrect. FIRS responded by withdrawing the assessment and re-issue same and inform the companies, the observed Error and corrections was over the proper basis period and the parties whose names it should be addressed to and that the error to be corrected were never the amount of $75,381,332.00. It said the error in the original assessment notice did not preclude the Tax Payer from discharging its Tax obligations arising thereof, which in this case should have been the payment on due date of the tax liability owed. The companies were not only privy to the amount involved in the assessment but also wilfully held on to Government Revenue for almost two years. Ojo further submitted that FRIS had therefore discharged its obligation to serve the assessment on the representative of the contract area in tax matters pursuant to section 39 of the Petroleum profit Tax Act. Consequently, he said the demand notice for the penalty and interest were valid, therefore the appeal should be allowed while the judgement of the Tribunal should be set aside, and also uphold the FIRS demand note. In his judgement, Justice Obiozor upheld the submission of Ladipo and allow the appeal.   Source: PM News

Court orders Shell to pay $17.9 million to FIRS Read More »

Kogi State and Its Oppressive Tax Policy

All over the world, taxation is the means of funding government businesses. The fiscal and monetary policies of any government are essentially the use of taxation in combination with other policies to regulate the economy. But taxation policy of government is not only to raise funds, it is also to grow the economy. Taxation can also be used as an instrument to redistribute incomes. Taxation is therefore a handy tool for variety of uses. Taxation is a double edged sword. If correctly used, could boost the economy. Its wrong uses has grave consequences for the government, the people and the business environment. Kogi State seems not to have got its tax policy right. It is very sad to note that while other states use taxation policy to generate funds and correct imbalances in their economies, Kogi State is using its own tax policy to fast track and catalyze the killings of micro, small and medium scale businesses in its domains. It is even sadder to note that those who stole government monies to build sudden business empires in the State are not taxed, while the tax authority is running after the ‘Mama Alakara’, ‘Mama alata’, ‘Mama oniyo’,  ‘Mama oniru’ and slamming them with outrageous taxes. The effect of this regressive and oppressive tax system is that many of the businesses which are the engine of growth of the State are beginning to close shops. A case of killing the goose that lays the golden eggs. The problem is that the tax officials don’t want to know whether a business is making profit or losses before giving them unbearable tax burdens. The tax people keep taxing the capitals of these businesses rather than their profits. They capitalised on the fact that these poor people hardly know how to keep any accounting records for the purpose of taxation. Many of them have hardly started a business for a month before they were admitted to taxes. And since they know little about the operating laws of taxes, they yield to defeat. Those who understand the laws head for the Court. Today, there are so many tax cases against Kogi Government in various courts. Nobody is against taxes. Taxes are legitimate but government must first encourage the buildings of the businesses such that will encourage regular tax payments by the owners. The real problem is that many of these small, small businesses were established from LAPO or some forms of cooperative loans. The businesses die soon after because of regressive tax system of the government that makes payment of these loans impossible. The most painful aspect is that many of the businesses killed by government tax system are owned by some very old pensioners, who hoped to operate there businesses for survival since their pensions and gratuities were never forthcoming. So while this category of people could not access their pensions, the small businesses they place hope on for survival were forced to close down by heavy taxes. What a vicious circle The tax people know where to get real taxes but they will not go there. Drive round the city of Lokoja and other places and you will see huge houses, huge petrol stations, huge hotels, event centres, shopping malls etc. These businesses were being hurriedly put together by emergency billionaires who are stealing our money on regular basis without paying taxes. Let us look at a typical case of the State regressive tax policy. Recently, the Tax authority has asked all private schools’ operators in Kogi State to start paying about N350k as tax or risk being closed down. I am sure this will mark the end of many private schools in the State. And this is a State where public school system has collapsed completely. The new tax system on the education sector may collapse an era of good education in the State. I also know some transporters that relocated from Kogi because of excessive taxes. Many hotels in the State are closing down for the same reason. In effect, many more workers are being laid off because of inappropriate tax policy of the Government. If you go to the stalls of some provision stores, you can count on your finger tips the number of item there. Yet, these businesses are the focus of the tax drive of Government. The rural areas are also not spared of this regressive tax policy. Kogi can operate a good tax system without killing the businesses. All they need to do is to pay salaries of workers fully and regularly. These monies become the purchasing power by which the business environments thrive and are able to pay taxes regularly and with ease. At the moment, the government of Kogi prides itself on increased revenue accruing to the State from IGR. But I bet, this will be short lived. Except Government builds and sustains taxable persons and taxable businesses, it will soon have nothing to tax. Government must provide conducive environment for progressive taxation otherwise the present exploitative tax system can only last for a while. For very soon, there will be nothing left to tax.   Source: Kogi Report

Kogi State and Its Oppressive Tax Policy Read More »

FIRS indicts First Bank in N25bn damages suit

In a Statement of Defence filed before a Federal High Court, Abuja, FIRS said that it received from First Bank a compact disc containing evidence that the indigenous company received a cash flow of over 6.8 million dollar. Executive Chairman of Nigeria’s Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), Mr Tunde Fowler Executive Chairman of Nigeria’s Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), Mr Tunde Fowler. The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) has said that it received from First Bank PLC, purported over-bloated turnover of account of a company, Biatemp Ventures Ltd, seeking redress for alleged manipulation of its account. In a Statement of Defence filed before a Federal High Court, Abuja, FIRS said that it received from First Bank a compact disc containing evidence that the indigenous company received a cash flow of over 6.8 million dollar. The company had sued First Bank and FIRS demanding N25 billion special and general damages over alleged manipulation of its domiciliary account and illegal withholding of its tax clearance certificate. Biantemp alleged that First Bank manipulated its domiciliary account with over-bloated turnover of over 6.8 million dollar (about N2.4 billion) whereas the deposit made to the account within the period was only 22,475 dollar (about N786,000) The company claimed that the alleged manipulation of its account and the delay in issuing its tax clearance certificate impeded it from participating in bids for several business opportunities leading to severe economic losses and huge embarrassment. In the statement of defence filed on behalf of FIRS by Messrs N.J. Kalu and Co. the federal revenue collection agency said it acted based on the information provided by the bank. Specifically, Mr Oyerogba Kehinde, a Senior Manager (Tax) with FIRS deposed that: “the second defendant (FIRS) was only performing her statutory function based on the information received from the first defendant (First Bank)” “That First Bank in compliance with the statutory provision, forwarded a compact disc (CD) to FIRS which contained evidence that plaintiff received a cash flow of ($6,861,618.00) into its account domiciled with the bank. “At the trial, FIRS shall rely and found on a letter dated Jan. 4, 2018 forwarding the said CD. ”FIRS shall also rely on a copy of printout from her database, showing the dollar inflow into the plaintiffs account with the bank. “FIRS only acted on the information and facts willingly provided to her by First Bank. ”That the bank has never written her to deny the fact she forwarded the compact disc containing information and evidence showing that the plaintiff received a cash flow of $6,861,618:00 on the 28th of November 2018 “At the trial, FIRS shall rely on the printout from her data base on returns filed by banks including the first defendant” The deponent denied allegation of collaboration to manipulate the plaintiff’s account and deliberate withhold of the company’s tax clearance certificate. He also stated that the plaintiff had not shown that it suffered colossal loss as a result of any action taken by the FIRS and urged the court to dismiss the suit against the service with cost. In the suit filed on behalf of the plaintiff by Adegboyega Awomolo, SAN, chamber, the company alleged that First Bank manipulated its domiciliary account with a purported turnover of 6.8 million dollar (about N2.4 billion) leading to the withhold of its 2018 tax clearance by FIRS. The company said the deposit made to its domiciliary account within the period was only 22,475 Dollar (about N786,000) being consultancy fee paid by its client, Forte Upstream Services Ltd. It stated that the said deposit of 22,475 dollar was actually withdrawn by its Chief Executive Officer (CEO) in about four respective transaction. “The alleged huge multiple cash dollar withdrawal seen to be made by the plaintiff’s Director between 7th and 21st December 2017 as captured by the FIRS were also enlarged mirrors of actual dollar withdrawals made by the plaintiff’s director” The plaintiff said when it obtained its statement of account from First Bank the inflow and outflow of fund was in complete variance with the record made available by the FIRS. The plaintiff therefore alleged that the acclaimed deposit and withdrawal of over 6.8 million dollar were enlarged mirror of the 22,475 dollar deposited into its account by its client for consultancy services and withdrawn by its CEO. First Bank in its statement of defence had denied the allegations that it manipulated the account of the plaintiff, collaborated or conspired in anyway with the FIRS. The defence filed by its lawyer, S.M. Jimmy Esq. the bank stressed that “the plaintiff’s account was never at any point in time tampered with, let alone manipulated”. “There is no time that First Bank, as a well known and reputable bank in Nigeria engage in such irresponsible and scandalous act”. It urged the court to declare that the plaintiff was not entitled to any of the reliefs sought. The bank also asked the court to declare the case as ‘frivolous, abuse of court process, gold digging exercise and should be dismissed with substantial cost”. Meanwhile, Justice Binta Murtala-Nyako has adjourned the case until Oct. 28 for further hearing.   Source: Pulse

FIRS indicts First Bank in N25bn damages suit Read More »

Multiple taxation hinders investment in telecom sector – NCC

The Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) has said multiple taxation and regulation of the telecoms industry discourage investments and deny government of long-term revenues as well as destroy the foundations for future growth. The Executive Commissioner (Stakeholder Management) of the NCC, Sunday Dare, disclosed this on Thursday during the South-East edition of the NCC Stakeholders’ Parliament themed: “Optimizing The Benefits of Telecoms Infrastructure in Nigeria” held in Enugu. He emphasized that it was a matter of great worry that at this point in Nigeria’s history, “we are still talking about protecting telecoms infrastructure from interference by agencies of government, or from multiple taxation and regulations, when all levels of government should actually be the ones encouraging and incentivizing operators to build infrastructure in their domains.” Represented at the occasion by Mr. Alkassim Umar, Head, Compliance Monitoring at NCC, Dare said that in essence, “this is why we must all work towards win-win solutions that enable operators roll-out fast and efficient networks which create opportunities for our citizens and develop our economies.” He said the NCC must take a long-term view of the need to provide a conducive environment for the spread of telecoms infrastructure, “be they BTS sites or fibre infrastructure.” He, however, stressed that the current “practice of imposing heavy sector-specific taxes and charges on telecoms infrastructure; levying huge Right-of-Way charges and decreeing onerous regulations may appear to bring immediate revenues to the coffers of the state.” Dare said the NCC must always insist that all “our licensees must comply with all legitimate tax and other obligations binding on them anywhere they operate. “Section 135 of the Nigerian Communications Act is very clear on this point, and it is one of the key elements of the NCC’s Code of Corporate Governance for the Telecoms Industry.” He further said: “We must all appreciate that the growth and seamless operations of telecoms infrastructure is critical to the social and economic growth of our states and communities. “This is why they are called “Critical National Infrastructure”, and this is why both the Criminal Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, and the Cybercrime Act of 2015 both prescribe heavy penalties (including terms of imprisonment) for those who tamper with such infrastructure.” In his speech titled “Legal Framework For Telecommunications Infrastructure Rollout,” the National Chairman, Nigeria Bar Association (NBA), Paul Usoro (SAN), said some of the challenges plaguing the telecoms infrastructure included multiple taxation and duplicated regulations. He said these challenges were major hindrances to telecoms infrastructure rollout and broadband penetration. “Multiple levies by governments are major disincentive to investors and threaten investment opportunities. It subdues telecoms infrastructure rollout and expansion,” said Usoro, ably represented by Chinedu Anyaso. However, a tax expert and Professor of Commercial Law at the University of Lagos, Prof. Abiola Sanni, described telecoms sector as the bedrock for economic growth in the country, explaining that the main problem bedevilling the sector was the abuse of regulatory power by the agencies. He advised stakeholders to sustain the advocacy for curbing exorbitant, arbitrary and oppressive charges by government ministries, departments and agencies.” The stakeholders who attended the parliament were drawn the telecom operators and state government agencies related to telecoms industry.   Source: Daily trust

Multiple taxation hinders investment in telecom sector – NCC Read More »

Absence of witness stalls MTN’s tax suit against AGF

The absence of a witness for the Attorney General of the Federation   on Wednesday forced the Federal High Court in  Lagos to adjourn till October  for hearing of    a  suit filed by MTN Nigeria Communication Limited  against  the AGF over N242bn  and $1.3bn import duties and withholding tax assessments. The telecommunications company, in the suit instituted by a writ, had challenged the legality of the AGF’s assessment of import duties, withholding tax and value added tax amounting to  N242bn and $1.3bn. At the Wednesday proceedings, counsel for the AGF, Tolu Mokolu, told the court that their witness  could not appear  in court as he had some challenges  in Abuja. Mokolu also said the lead counsel, Tijani Gazali, was also held up in Abuja,  urging  the court to grant an adjournment. Counsel for the telecoms firm, Wole Olanipekun (SAN), said neither would  he oppose  the request  nor  ask for cost.  Justice Chukwukekwu Aneke  then adjourned the case till October 29, 31 for trial. In a statement  on Wednesday, MTN  said it had  faith  in the Nigerian court system and was ready to present its case whenever the opportunity arose. The company  insisted that it was in “full compliance with all extant tax and regulatory obligations. We reiterate our commitment to obeying all Nigerian laws, rules and regulations that govern and guide our business practices.” MTN is seeking  a declaration that the AGF’s demand  was premised on a process which was malicious, unreasonable and illegal. It is also  seeking  a declaratory relief that the purported revenue asset investigation  carried out by the Federal Government  between 2007 and 2017, and its decision conveyed through the office of the AGF in a letter dated August 20, 2018, violated the provisions of Section 36 of the  Nigerian  Constitution. It also sought a declaration that the AGF acted in excess of  his  powers by  demanding  payment of import duties on the importation of physical goods. The company  wants  a declaration that the AGF acted illegally by usurping the powers of the Federal Inland Revenue Service to audit and demand the remittance of withholding tax and value added tax and declaration that the purported self-assessment exercise instituted by the AGF via a  letter dated May 10, 2018, is unknown to law, null and void and of no effect whatsoever.   Source: Punch

Absence of witness stalls MTN’s tax suit against AGF Read More »

Loading...