Tax news

MTN Deducted Tax From 2015 Fine, Claims Nigeria Tax Agency

MTN Nigeria Communications LTD has been accused by Babatunde Fowler, chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), of deducting tax from the N330 billion fine it paid to the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC). The penalty was imposed in 2015 over SIM card registration infractions. Fowler maintained that fines and penalties for regulatory infractions are revenues paid to the Federal Government and should not be subjected to any tax deduction. “The MTN took a position that the fine or penalty should be tax-deductible. But the FIRS said that does not make sense. One cannot be given a penalty or fine, which is a punitive measure, and the company is saying it is tax-deductible so that it will get a tax credit on that,” the FIRS boss added. The NCC had in October 2015 imposed a fine of N1.04 trillion on the telecommunications giants for non-compliance with a deadline set by the Commission to disconnect all unregistered SIM cards.  The move by NCC followed accusations by mobile phone users that the regulator had failed to bring operators to account for poor services to subscribers. The regulator later reduced the fine to N780 billion in December 2015, having taken into consideration the stability of the telecommunication sector. The fine was further reduced to N330 billion after MTN agreed to be listed on the Nigeria Stock Exchange (NSE).  The agreements have now been fulfilled by MTN, including the listing of 20.3 billion shares in May this year.   Source: Sahara

MTN Deducted Tax From 2015 Fine, Claims Nigeria Tax Agency Read More »

Google, Facebook, Apple Weigh in on Altera Tax Case

Intel-owned Altera Corp. received more industry backing as some of the biggest names in tech and tax urged the Ninth Circuit to review a cross-border tax case with potentially billions of dollars at stake. In multiple briefs, the giants urged the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to hold an en banc rehearing after a panel upheld Treasury regulations affecting taxes on certain transfers within multinational companies. The companies behind the Aug. 1 briefs include Google LLC, Apple Inc., Facebook Inc., PepsiCo Inc., PwC, Deloitte Tax LLP, KPMG LLP, and the National Association of Manufacturers. Altera wants the Ninth Circuit to review the June 7 ruling that Treasury acted lawfully in requiring related parties—such as entities within a multinational company—to share the costs of stock-option compensation in qualified cost-sharing agreements. These are agreements to share the costs of developing property in exchange for sharing income generated by the property.   Source: Bloomberg

Google, Facebook, Apple Weigh in on Altera Tax Case Read More »

FIRS, MTN disagree over tax/fine status

MTN Nigeria, on Friday, admitted to a technical disagreement between it and the Federal Inland Revenue Service on how the 2015 fine should be treated for tax purposes. Mr Onome Okwah, Manager, Public Relations and Protocol, Corporate Affairs/Corporate Relations, MTN, disclosed this in a statement in Lagos. According to him, the organisation’s attention has been drawn to media reports regarding the status of taxes relating to the 2015 fine imposed on MTN. He, however, added that while the monies had been paid to FIRS, MTN had taken the disagreement to the Tax Tribunal set up by the FIRS Chairman and Minister of Finance and were awaiting its decision. “MTN remains fully compliant with the Nigerian tax laws and will abide by the findings of the tribunal. “The company is committed to meeting its fiscal responsibilities and contributing to the social and economic development of Nigeria. “Since incorporation in 2001, MTN has invested more than N2 trillion in the Nigerian economy and has paid more than N1.7 trillion in taxes, levies and other regulatory fees. The News Agency of Nigeria reports that Mr Babatunde Fowler, Chairman, FIRS, recently accused MTN of deducting tax from the N330 billion fine it paid to the Nigerian Communications Commission. Fowler maintained that fines and penalties for regulatory infractions were revenues paid to the Federal Government and should not be subjected to any tax deduction. NCC had in October 2015 imposed a N1.04 trillion fine on the telecommunications giant for alleged non-compliance with the deadline set by the commission to disconnect all unregistered SIM cards. The regulator reduced the fine to N780 billion in December 2015, having taken into consideration the stability of the telecommunication sector. The fine was further reduced to N330 billion after MTN had agreed to be listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange.   Source: Punch

FIRS, MTN disagree over tax/fine status Read More »

New holiday home tax rules explained

HMRC plans to introduce new rules for taxpayers and intermediaries on cross-border tax planning, and which might affect British residents’ who buy overseas properties. Thinking of buying a holiday home in the Dordogne? The taxman needs to know HMRC plans to introduce new rules for taxpayers and intermediaries on cross-border tax planning, and which might affect British residents’ who buy overseas properties. It is not uncommon for those buying this type of property to be offered alternative ways of holding the asset. If the main benefit is the avoidance of tax the details will need to be reported to HMRC. HMRC acknowledges that one of the primary purposes of their proposals is to refine the requirement to report tax planning where cross-border transactions are involved. The taxman is aware that historically UK residents have acquired overseas assets with undeclared income and have used offshore structures to hide the asset from the tax authorities. HMRC is concerned that unless they are informed at the time of the transaction there is a risk that tax could be lost. HMRC is interested in the source of the funds used to acquire the holiday home, how the maintenance costs are paid, whether the letting of the property generates rental income or whether a capital gain is made when the property is sold. If HMRC is told of the acquisition of the property, this will allow them to consider if there were any concerns with how the taxpayer funded the property and met the running costs. HMRC also wishes to gather information on tax planning solutions offered to taxpayers to judge whether one of the benefits would be the avoidance or evasion of taxes. The government has undertaken to share this information with other EU member states to ensure that cross-border transactions are not used for this purpose. Brits with overseas assets have been under the spotlight since the mid-noughties, as HMRC has continued to target offshore income and gains not previously reported. Starting in January 2016, data was gathered by banks under the OECD’s Common Reporting Standard (CRS) for the automatic exchange of information. This required the participating tax authorities to exchange information with the country in which the account holder was tax resident. HMRC has also cracked down on marketed tax avoidance schemes, and the facilitation of tax evasion by professionals and intermediaries both inside and outside the UK. The government is consulting on new legislation that will require the disclosure of cross-border tax avoidance arrangements. The requirement to report will apply even when the planning is not adopted, all that is necessary is that the promoter has made the planning available to or discussed it with the taxpayer. All parties involved will need to disclose details of the planning, with taxpayers required to report the planning on their personal tax returns. Under the terms of the OECD Directive, the relevant tax authorities will use the information to target tax avoidance and evasion and, where appropriate, share the information with EU member states. The consultation document makes it clear that there may need to be a report made, even where the planning may be in line with and in the spirit of the law. HMRC’s concern is that there is a risk that avoidance or evasion of tax could still be one of the main benefits of the planning.   Source: Legit

New holiday home tax rules explained Read More »

Operators worry over vessel import tax, competition

Many stakeholders in the Nigerian maritime industry are worried about the import tax imposed on new vessels. They say this may put them at a competitive disadvantage among other African countries in a free market. A former Director General of the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency, Mfon Usoro, observes that whereas aircraft brought into Nigeria are registered at zero per cent duty, a shipowner is required to pay 14 per cent of the cost of a new vessel as tax. According to her, this makes people still patronise a temporary importation route because it is cheaper for them than to pay tax and register their vessels in Nigeria. On AfCFTA, Usoro, who spoke at a public lecture recently, said the fear of operators was that of competitiveness. She said, “If you are charging import tax on a Nigerian flagged vessel at 14 per cent of the cost of the vessel and above, South Africa charges zero import tax. “For the Nigerian flagged ship, there is a multiplier effect on everything that is dependent on that trade or vessel. It means the operational cost in South Africa is low; everything is low. So, they cannot compete with Nigeria who is already setting the shipowner up for failure. “So, we are afraid that the business that should come to us will go to other countries that are competitive.” She added, “The point is not about dumping because there are ways we can stop the goods from coming in.  It is competitive pricing. If you want us to buy goods from Nigeria instead of buying from Togo, if your goods are more expensive than those of Togo, why should we buy from you? If your port charges are higher than Togo port charges, how will your goods be competitive?” In addition to this, operators also decry the lack of conducive environment in the maritime sector. The President, Seaports Terminal Operators Association of Nigeria, Mrs Victoria Haastrup, says, “I am suffering; my people are suffering because of the enabling environment that is just not there. “When a ship comes from China, Europe and anywhere in the world, when it berths, you cannot be sure of when it will be able to discharge and go back. And time is of essence to ships. You know what that is costing the importers and the charterers. “In other parts of the world, there is automatic digitisation. Right from the control room, ships are being discharged; you don’t see a single human being. “You sit in your house, log onto the Internet and you can clear your goods without going to the ports. But that cannot happen in Nigeria.” Analysts lament that apart from lack of full automation, the poor condition of roads linking the ports result in trucks spending months on the road trying to access the ports. Stakeholders in the productive sector of the economy had for years reportedly been reluctant to embrace trade pacts that would open the Nigerian market to competition from outside. The high cost of doing business in Nigeria, according to them, is bound to make them vulnerable when pitched against operators in low-cost business environment. Nigeria occupied the 146th position out of 190 countries in the 2018 World Bank Ease of Doing Business rankings. This was even as Ghana, Nigeria’s close neighbour and competitor in the African market, ranked 114, while Cote d’Ivoire ranked 122, Togo ranked 137. Other countries that will compete with Nigeria in the free trade market are Rwanda, which ranked 29; Kenya, 61; Senegal, 141; Egypt, 120; Mozambique, 135 and Jamaica, 75, among others. While reacting to President Muhammadu Buhari’s signing of the pact on July 7, the Director General, Manufacturers Association of Nigeria, Segun Ajayi-Kadir, said, “We shall work together to prevail on the government to do its bit by providing the conducive atmosphere. The infrastructure challenge that constitutes supply constraints should be removed.   Source: Punch

Operators worry over vessel import tax, competition Read More »

VAT payment takes it toll on stock market transactions in Nigeria

In less than a week after the reinstatement of Value-Added Tax (VAT) collection on stock market transactions in Nigeria, reports have shown that investors could pay as much as N2.5 billion yearly in additional costs on trading. The five-year VAT exemption on stock exchange transactions expired on July 24, 2019. Thus, investors and dealing members of the capital market began to pay the tax for transactions carried out on the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) from July 25. The charges are applicable to commissions earned on the traded value of shares; commissions payable to the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC); and commissions payable to the Central Securities Clearing System (CSCS). Based on transaction figures in the past two years, the re-introduced VAT payment would cost traders and dealers an average of N2.49 billion yearly or N207 million monthly, the Nation said, adding that the non-reversal of the tax has taken its toll on transactions immediately.  The addition of VAT to market charges last weekend increased total costs of transactions – on both buy and sell sides – from 3.7 percent as at July 24 to 3.9 percent as of July 25. Consequently, stakeholders in the Nigerian capital market have expressed concerns on the matter. “It will obviously increase transaction costs and make our market more uncompetitive,” the CEO of Sofunix Investment and Communications, Sola Oni, said. “High transaction cost is at variance with global best practices. The policy is (an) overkill at a period when investors’ confidence in the market is still fragile.” With the re-imposition of five percent VAT, commission payable to stockbrokers increased from 1.35 percent per transaction to 1.41 percent; commission payable to the NSE increased from 0.3 percent to 0.315 percent while the commission payable to CSCS increased from 0.36 percent to 0.378 percent. In addition, investors have to pay stamp duty of 0.075 percent on each transaction.  A further breakdown of the total costs per transaction showed that total costs on the buy-side increased from 1.72 percent as of July 24, 2019, to 1.79 percent by July 25, 2019, while total costs on the sell-side increased from 2.02 percent to 2.12 percent. The CSCS, the clearinghouse for the stock market, automatically deducts VAT on commissions payable to it and the NSE while operators use preconfigured software.  However, both bodies only receive commissions on sale transactions while operators charge commissions on both sell and buy transactions. Stamp Duty and VAT on commissions on both sell and buy transactions are further charged by the government. Considering total transactions at the NSE had dropped from N2.543 trillion in 2017 to N2.404 trillion in 2018, capital markets stakeholders have berated the government for what they described as its unconcerned attitude towards the capital market, denouncing the re-imposition of VAT on stock market transactions as “insensitive.”   Source: Ventures Africa

VAT payment takes it toll on stock market transactions in Nigeria Read More »

French parliament approves tax on digital tech giants

France has approved a digital services tax despite threats of retaliation by the U.S., which targets American tech giants. The 3 percent levy will apply to revenue from digital services earned in France by firms with over $845 million worldwide. U.S. President Donald Trump ordered an investigation into the tax, a step that could lead to the United States imposing new tariffs or other trade restrictions. France pushed ahead with the tax after EU countries failed to agree a levy valid across the bloc in the face of opposition from Ireland, Denmark, Sweden and Finland. Other EU countries including Austria, Britain, Spain and Italy have also announced plans for their own digital taxes.   Source: The Nigerian

French parliament approves tax on digital tech giants Read More »

Ekiti Assembly passes new tax bill

The Ekiti State House of Assembly on Tuesday, passed a new bill that would guide tax policy and revenue generation. The Speaker, Funminiyi Afuye, who passed the bill through a voice vote, commended the House Committee on Finance and Appropriation for a “good job.” He said,   “Ekiti needs to look inwards at this challenging time and generate more money in view of the dwindling revenues of the Federal Government. The passage of the tax bill was sequel to that of the Board of Internal Revenue Service Bill 2019 to law by the legislative body. The Assembly, had during its previous plenary, adopted as a working document, the report of the committee on Finance and Appropriation  in respect of the operation of the State Revenue Board. The Chairman of the committee, Olubunmi Adelugba (Emure Constituency), had, while submitting the report on Tuesday, said   “the new law would engender collaborative efforts among stakeholders through effective tax control system. and formation of better policy for revenue generation in the state.” Adelugba, who is the Chief Whip of the Assembly, had said the new law as contained in the committee’s report would engender collaborative efforts among stakeholders through efective tax payment for more revenue that will be in the overall interest of the residents. Adelugba called attention of the House to the flooding being experienced in some towns, especially in Emure community since the beginning of the raining season and urged government to find urgent and lasting solution to the threats.   Source: punch

Ekiti Assembly passes new tax bill Read More »

Stakeholders kick against VAT on equities transactions

Capital market stakeholders have condemned the federal government directive to return Valued Added Tax (VAT), on all stock market transactions, saying the action is disincentive to investment. Already, dealing member firms of the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE), have been directed to charge VAT on all commissions applicable to market transactions effective July 25.A notice to dealing member (stockbroking) firms by Olufemi Shobanjo, Head, Broker-Dealer Regulation at the NSE, recalled its circular dated October 27, 2014, referenced BDR/CIR/GOI/10/14, on VAT exemption on commissions on stock transactions order. This was granted by then Coordinating Minister for the Economy and Minister of Finance, in 2014, as published in the Government’s Official Gazette No. 95, Vol. 101 issued on July 30, 2014. Shobanjo said the order became effective on July 25, 2014, and valid for a five-year period, and will expire on 24 July 2019, following which dealing members, in the absence of a further extension, are to charge VAT effective July 25, on all commissions applicable to capital market transactions. But stakeholders, who spoke in an interview with The Guardian, argued that the market had suffered unprecedented lull with low patronage in the past five years even with the removal of VAT. According to them, the return of VAT would further dampen investors’ appetite on stocks, trigger migration of investment to money market instruments, and deter foreign participation in stock market. They maintained that transaction cost in the Nigerian capital market is one of the highest in the world, noting that this has made it difficult to attract global investors to the equalities market, thus reducing its capacity to contribute meaningfully to capital formation in Nigeria. Recall that the former Finance Minister and Coordinator of the Economy, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, in approving the elimination of stamp duties and VAT on market transactions, said these were a panacea to reviving the Nigerian bourse, which then struggled to bounce back since its crash during the global recession in 2009. Okonjo-Iweala had noted that a vibrant capital market is, essential to the government’s Economic Transformation Agenda, especially in terms of raising the much-needed long-term financing for critical infrastructure and the housing sector. She had said: “Research (by the IMF and the World Bank) has shown that solid economic growth in any country is closely linked to the joint development of the banking sector and the capital markets. While the banking sector has already been cleaned-up, the capital market needs some intervention. “Taxes on stock exchange transactions fees are as high as 12 percent (five per cent in VAT and up to seven per cent in stamp duties) – much higher than in other jurisdictions, and these constitute a major disincentive to invest in the Nigerian capital market. I will like to announce that the Federal Government has consented to: Waive the 0.075 per cent stamp duties payable on stock exchange transaction fees; and,“Exempt from VAT, commissions: (a) earned on traded values of shares, (b) payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and (c) payable to the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE), and the Central Securities Clearing System (CSCS); by including these commissions in the list of VAT-exempt goods and services.” Against this backdrop, stakeholders urged the Federal Government to, as a matter of urgency, abolish the withholding tax, VAT, and contract stamp from the market to enable it contribute meaningfully to capital formation.   Source: Guardian

Stakeholders kick against VAT on equities transactions Read More »

FIRS sues firm over alleged $97m tax evasion

The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), has taken the Midwestern Oil and Gas Company  Limited to a Federal High Court, Lagos over failure to pay  the outstanding tax liability due to the Federal government  in the sum of $97,086,985. In an affidavit sworn to by a legal practitioner from the law firm of DAC legal practitioners, Mr Ayodeji Jolaoso, and filed before the court by Dapo Akinosun, the deponent averred that, as normal obligatory routine, Mid Midwestern Oil and Gas company  filed its self-assessment notice for the year 2012-2013 which was delivered to the plaintiffs showing that it made a profit of $271,857,000 and $173,613,950 in the two years. But FIRS verified the claim by the company in its self-assessment and discovered that the defendant did not pay any amount as its petroleum tax and Educational tax for the year 2012 and 2013 respectively.FIRS thereafter assessed the company based on its declared profit for the year 2012 and 2013, issued and served a notice of assessment dated January 29, 2015 and  demanded notice 11th April, 2018, indicating the outstanding tax liability of the company covering Petroleum ta and educational tax. The break down of the outstanding tax liability of the company are as follows: Petroleum profit tax liability for the year 2012 is $65,065,644.00; petroleum profit tax liability for year 2013 is $28,024,364; Education tax liability for the year 2012 is $2,436,340 and Education tax liability for year 2013 is $1,565,638.00. The total amount of the outstanding tax liability of the company due to the Federal Government from the taxes stated above Is $97.086,985.00.The company did not raise any formal objection to the assessment and has since refused to pay the outstanding debt.The plaintiff instructed its solicitor who wrote a letter further reminding the company of the demand for remittance of the outstanding tax  liability. In an attempt to settle this matter amicably, the plaintiff’s solicitor also invited the defendant to a meeting to discuss the payment of the outstanding tax liabilities highlighted above and other issues arising therefrom by a letter September 19 ,2018.The defendant has refused and neglected to pay its outstanding tax liabilities as assessed by the plaintiff despite all attempts made by the FIRS to ensure the remittance of the company’s Petroleum Profit Tax and Education Tax for the years for the years 2012 and 2013. Consequently, the FIRS, is urging the court to direct Midwestern Oil to pay its outstanding tax liability arising from the Petroleum profit tax and Education tax assessed in the sum of $97,086,985.00. FIRS is also  praying the court to direct the company to pay a penalty of N10,000.00 daily as consequence of late payment of the tax due from 1st February, 2015 till the date its tax liabilities are remitted as prescribed by section 51(1) of the Petroleum Profit Tax Act (PPTA)  cap P13,Law of the Federation 2004 and Education Tax Act. CapE4, Law of the Federation of Nigeria 2004.Midwestern Oil and Gas Company has not filed any defence. Meanwhile the case has been adjourned till after court vacation for hearing.   Source: Guardian

FIRS sues firm over alleged $97m tax evasion Read More »

Loading...