Tobi Aminu

Court orders Shell to pay $17.9 million to FIRS

A Federal High Court,in Lagos south west Nigeria,ย  Presided overย  by Justice Chuka Obiozor, todayย  ordered four multinational Oil companies, namely Shell Nigeria Exploration and Production Company Limited, Esso Exploration and Production Nigeria( DEEPWATER) Limited, Nigeria Agip Exploration Limited, and Total E&P Nigeria Limited to pay a total sum of $17,900,484.80., as penaltyย  and interest respectively on the imposed education tax of $75,381,332.00. The judgement of the court was as as a result of appeal filed before the court by Federal Inland Revenue Service, FIRS, against the judgement of the Tax Appeal Tribunal that set aside the demand notice, including penalty and interest and ruled in favour the oil companies. Dissatisfied with the judgement of the tribunal, FIRS filed an appeal before the Federal High Court. In a notice of appeal filed and argued before the court, byย  Ladipo Ojo, the appellant contended that FIRS issued a notice of assessment and serve it on Shell Petroleum Company, following which the company raised objection that the basis period used was incorrect. FIRS responded by withdrawing the assessment and re-issue same and inform the companies, the observed Error and corrections was over the proper basis period and the parties whose names it should be addressed to and that the error to be corrected were never the amount of $75,381,332.00. It said the error in the original assessment notice did not preclude the Tax Payer from discharging its Tax obligations arising thereof, which in this case should have been the payment on due date of the tax liability owed. The companies were not only privy to the amount involved in the assessment but also wilfully held on to Government Revenue for almost two years. Ojo further submitted that FRIS had therefore discharged its obligation to serve the assessment on the representative of the contract area in tax matters pursuant to section 39 of the Petroleum profit Tax Act. Consequently, he said the demand notice for the penalty and interest were valid, therefore the appeal should be allowed while the judgement of the Tribunal should be set aside, and also uphold the FIRS demand note. In his judgement, Justice Obiozor upheld the submission of Ladipo and allow the appeal.   Source: PM News

Court orders Shell to pay $17.9 million to FIRS Read More ยป

Google endorses ‘international tax deal’ for multinational

Google said Thursday it supports a global agreement on taxation that could allocate more taxes from multinationals to jurisdictions outside their home countries. “We support the movement toward a new comprehensive, international framework for how multinational companies are taxed,” said a blog post from Karan Bhatia, Google’s vice president for public affairs and public policy. “Corporate income tax is an important way companies contribute to the countries and communities where they do business, and we would like to see a tax environment that people find reasonable and appropriate.” The announcement from Google comes with Group of 20 leaders discussing plans for a global tax system that aims to help some countries get more revenue from tech firms. At the same time France is moving toward imposing its own tax on digital giants based on revenue instead of profits amid opposition from Washington. Google said the change would probably mean Silicon Valley tech giants would pay less in the United States and more in other jurisdictions, in a departure from the longstanding practice of paying most taxes in a company’s home country. Google said its overall global tax rate has been around 23 percent for the past 10 years, in line with the 23.7 percent average rate across the members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, and that most of this is paid in the United States. “We’re not alone in paying most of our corporate income tax in our home country,” Bhatia said. “That allocation reflects longstanding rules about how corporate profits should be split among various countries. American companies pay most of their corporate taxes in the United States — just as German, British, French and Japanese firms pay most of their corporate taxes in their home countries.” Google said a global agreement could avoid squabbles on the best way to allocate taxes from digital giants. “Without a new, comprehensive and multilateral agreement, countries might simply impose discriminatory unilateral taxes on foreign firms in various sectors,” Bhatia said. “Indeed, we already see such problems in some of the specific proposals that have been put forward. That kind of race to the bottom would create new barriers to trade, slow cross-border investment, and hamper economic growth.” A new treaty, he said, “will restore confidence in the international tax system and promote more cross-border trade and investment. “   Source: France24

Google endorses ‘international tax deal’ for multinational Read More ยป

Kogi State and Its Oppressive Tax Policy

All over the world, taxation is the means of funding government businesses. The fiscal and monetary policies of any government are essentially the use of taxation in combination with other policies to regulate the economy. But taxation policy of government is not only to raise funds, it is also to grow the economy. Taxation can also be used as an instrument to redistribute incomes. Taxation is therefore a handy tool for variety of uses. Taxation is a double edged sword. If correctly used, could boost the economy. Its wrong uses has grave consequences for the government, the people and the business environment. Kogi State seems not to have got its tax policy right. It is very sad to note that while other states use taxation policy to generate funds and correct imbalances in their economies, Kogi State is using its own tax policy to fast track and catalyze the killings of micro, small and medium scale businesses in its domains. It is even sadder to note that those who stole government monies to build sudden business empires in the State are not taxed, while the tax authority is running after the โ€˜Mama Alakaraโ€™, โ€˜Mama alataโ€™, โ€˜Mama oniyoโ€™,ย  โ€˜Mama oniruโ€™ and slamming them with outrageous taxes. The effect of this regressive and oppressive tax system is that many of the businesses which are the engine of growth of the State are beginning to close shops. A case of killing the goose that lays the golden eggs. The problem is that the tax officials donโ€™t want to know whether a business is making profit or losses before giving them unbearable tax burdens. The tax people keep taxing the capitals of these businesses rather than their profits. They capitalised on the fact that these poor people hardly know how to keep any accounting records for the purpose of taxation. Many of them have hardly started a business for a month before they were admitted to taxes. And since they know little about the operating laws of taxes, they yield to defeat. Those who understand the laws head for the Court. Today, there are so many tax cases against Kogi Government in various courts. Nobody is against taxes. Taxes are legitimate but government must first encourage the buildings of the businesses such that will encourage regular tax payments by the owners. The real problem is that many of these small, small businesses were established from LAPO or some forms of cooperative loans. The businesses die soon after because of regressive tax system of the government that makes payment of these loans impossible. The most painful aspect is that many of the businesses killed by government tax system are owned by some very old pensioners, who hoped to operate there businesses for survival since their pensions and gratuities were never forthcoming. So while this category of people could not access their pensions, the small businesses they place hope on for survival were forced to close down by heavy taxes. What a vicious circle The tax people know where to get real taxes but they will not go there. Drive round the city of Lokoja and other places and you will see huge houses, huge petrol stations, huge hotels, event centres, shopping malls etc. These businesses were being hurriedly put together by emergency billionaires who are stealing our money on regular basis without paying taxes. Let us look at a typical case of the State regressive tax policy. Recently, the Tax authority has asked all private schoolsโ€™ operators in Kogi State to start paying about N350k as tax or risk being closed down. I am sure this will mark the end of many private schools in the State. And this is a State where public school system has collapsed completely. The new tax system on the education sector may collapse an era of good education in the State. I also know some transporters that relocated from Kogi because of excessive taxes. Many hotels in the State are closing down for the same reason. In effect, many more workers are being laid off because of inappropriate tax policy of the Government. If you go to the stalls of some provision stores, you can count on your finger tips the number of item there. Yet, these businesses are the focus of the tax drive of Government. The rural areas are also not spared of this regressive tax policy. Kogi can operate a good tax system without killing the businesses. All they need to do is to pay salaries of workers fully and regularly. These monies become the purchasing power by which the business environments thrive and are able to pay taxes regularly and with ease. At the moment, the government of Kogi prides itself on increased revenue accruing to the State from IGR. But I bet, this will be short lived. Except Government builds and sustains taxable persons and taxable businesses, it will soon have nothing to tax. Government must provide conducive environment for progressive taxation otherwise the present exploitative tax system can only last for a while. For very soon, there will be nothing left to tax.   Source: Kogi Report

Kogi State and Its Oppressive Tax Policy Read More ยป

FIRS indicts First Bank in N25bn damages suit

In a Statement of Defence filed before a Federal High Court, Abuja, FIRS said that it received from First Bank a compact disc containing evidence that the indigenous company received a cash flow of over 6.8 million dollar. Executive Chairman of Nigeria’s Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), Mr Tunde Fowler Executive Chairman of Nigeria’s Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), Mr Tunde Fowler. The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) has said that it received from First Bank PLC, purported over-bloated turnover of account of a company, Biatemp Ventures Ltd, seeking redress for alleged manipulation of its account. In a Statement of Defence filed before a Federal High Court, Abuja, FIRS said that it received from First Bank a compact disc containing evidence that the indigenous company received a cash flow of over 6.8 million dollar. The company had sued First Bank and FIRS demanding N25 billion special and general damages over alleged manipulation of its domiciliary account and illegal withholding of its tax clearance certificate. Biantemp alleged that First Bank manipulated its domiciliary account with over-bloated turnover of over 6.8 million dollar (about N2.4 billion) whereas the deposit made to the account within the period was only 22,475 dollar (about N786,000) The company claimed that the alleged manipulation of its account and the delay in issuing its tax clearance certificate impeded it from participating in bids for several business opportunities leading to severe economic losses and huge embarrassment. In the statement of defence filed on behalf of FIRS by Messrs N.J. Kalu and Co. the federal revenue collection agency said it acted based on the information provided by the bank. Specifically, Mr Oyerogba Kehinde, a Senior Manager (Tax) with FIRS deposed that: โ€œthe second defendant (FIRS) was only performing her statutory function based on the information received from the first defendant (First Bank)โ€ โ€œThat First Bank in compliance with the statutory provision, forwarded a compact disc (CD) to FIRS which contained evidence that plaintiff received a cash flow of ($6,861,618.00) into its account domiciled with the bank. โ€œAt the trial, FIRS shall rely and found on a letter dated Jan. 4, 2018 forwarding the said CD. โ€FIRS shall also rely on a copy of printout from her database, showing the dollar inflow into the plaintiffs account with the bank. โ€œFIRS only acted on the information and facts willingly provided to her by First Bank. โ€That the bank has never written her to deny the fact she forwarded the compact disc containing information and evidence showing that the plaintiff received a cash flow of $6,861,618:00 on the 28th of November 2018 โ€œAt the trial, FIRS shall rely on the printout from her data base on returns filed by banks including the first defendantโ€ The deponent denied allegation of collaboration to manipulate the plaintiffโ€™s account and deliberate withhold of the companyโ€™s tax clearance certificate. He also stated that the plaintiff had not shown that it suffered colossal loss as a result of any action taken by the FIRS and urged the court to dismiss the suit against the service with cost. In the suit filed on behalf of the plaintiff by Adegboyega Awomolo, SAN, chamber, the company alleged that First Bank manipulated its domiciliary account with a purported turnover of 6.8 million dollar (about N2.4 billion) leading to the withhold of its 2018 tax clearance by FIRS. The company said the deposit made to its domiciliary account within the period was only 22,475 Dollar (about N786,000) being consultancy fee paid by its client, Forte Upstream Services Ltd. It stated that the said deposit of 22,475 dollar was actually withdrawn by its Chief Executive Officer (CEO) in about four respective transaction. โ€œThe alleged huge multiple cash dollar withdrawal seen to be made by the plaintiffโ€™s Director between 7th and 21st December 2017 as captured by the FIRS were also enlarged mirrors of actual dollar withdrawals made by the plaintiffโ€™s directorโ€ The plaintiff said when it obtained its statement of account from First Bank the inflow and outflow of fund was in complete variance with the record made available by the FIRS. The plaintiff therefore alleged that the acclaimed deposit and withdrawal of over 6.8 million dollar were enlarged mirror of the 22,475 dollar deposited into its account by its client for consultancy services and withdrawn by its CEO. First Bank in its statement of defence had denied the allegations that it manipulated the account of the plaintiff, collaborated or conspired in anyway with the FIRS. The defence filed by its lawyer, S.M. Jimmy Esq. the bank stressed that โ€œthe plaintiffโ€™s account was never at any point in time tampered with, let alone manipulatedโ€. โ€œThere is no time that First Bank, as a well known and reputable bank in Nigeria engage in such irresponsible and scandalous actโ€. It urged the court to declare that the plaintiff was not entitled to any of the reliefs sought. The bank also asked the court to declare the case as โ€˜frivolous, abuse of court process, gold digging exercise and should be dismissed with substantial costโ€. Meanwhile, Justice Binta Murtala-Nyako has adjourned the case until Oct. 28 for further hearing.   Source: Pulse

FIRS indicts First Bank in N25bn damages suit Read More ยป

Multiple taxation hinders investment in telecom sector โ€“ NCC

The Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) has said multiple taxation and regulation of the telecoms industry discourage investments and deny government of long-term revenues as well as destroy the foundations for future growth. The Executive Commissioner (Stakeholder Management) of the NCC, Sunday Dare, disclosed this on Thursday during the South-East edition of the NCC Stakeholdersโ€™ Parliament themed: โ€œOptimizing The Benefits of Telecoms Infrastructure in Nigeriaโ€ held in Enugu. He emphasized that it was a matter of great worry that at this point in Nigeriaโ€™s history, โ€œwe are still talking about protecting telecoms infrastructure from interference by agencies of government, or from multiple taxation and regulations, when all levels of government should actually be the ones encouraging and incentivizing operators to build infrastructure in their domains.โ€ Represented at the occasion by Mr. Alkassim Umar, Head, Compliance Monitoring at NCC, Dare said that in essence, โ€œthis is why we must all work towards win-win solutions that enable operators roll-out fast and efficient networks which create opportunities for our citizens and develop our economies.โ€ He said the NCC must take a long-term view of the need to provide a conducive environment for the spread of telecoms infrastructure, โ€œbe they BTS sites or fibre infrastructure.โ€ He, however, stressed that the current โ€œpractice of imposing heavy sector-specific taxes and charges on telecoms infrastructure; levying huge Right-of-Way charges and decreeing onerous regulations may appear to bring immediate revenues to the coffers of the state.โ€ Dare said the NCC must always insist that all โ€œour licensees must comply with all legitimate tax and other obligations binding on them anywhere they operate. โ€œSection 135 of the Nigerian Communications Act is very clear on this point, and it is one of the key elements of the NCCโ€™s Code of Corporate Governance for the Telecoms Industry.โ€ He further said: โ€œWe must all appreciate that the growth and seamless operations of telecoms infrastructure is critical to the social and economic growth of our states and communities. โ€œThis is why they are called โ€œCritical National Infrastructureโ€, and this is why both the Criminal Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, and the Cybercrime Act of 2015 both prescribe heavy penalties (including terms of imprisonment) for those who tamper with such infrastructure.โ€ In his speech titled โ€œLegal Framework For Telecommunications Infrastructure Rollout,โ€ the National Chairman, Nigeria Bar Association (NBA), Paul Usoro (SAN), said some of the challenges plaguing the telecoms infrastructure included multiple taxation and duplicated regulations. He said these challenges were major hindrances to telecoms infrastructure rollout and broadband penetration. โ€œMultiple levies by governments are major disincentive to investors and threaten investment opportunities. It subdues telecoms infrastructure rollout and expansion,โ€ said Usoro, ably represented by Chinedu Anyaso. However, a tax expert and Professor of Commercial Law at the University of Lagos, Prof. Abiola Sanni, described telecoms sector as the bedrock for economic growth in the country, explaining that the main problem bedevilling the sector was the abuse of regulatory power by the agencies. He advised stakeholders to sustain the advocacy for curbing exorbitant, arbitrary and oppressive charges by government ministries, departments and agencies.โ€ The stakeholders who attended the parliament were drawn the telecom operators and state government agencies related to telecoms industry.   Source: Daily trust

Multiple taxation hinders investment in telecom sector โ€“ NCC Read More ยป

Absence of witness stalls MTNโ€™s tax suit against AGF

The absence of a witness for the Attorney General of the Federationย ย  on Wednesday forced the Federal High Court inย  Lagos to adjourn till Octoberย  for hearing ofย ย ย  aย  suit filed by MTN Nigeria Communication Limitedย  againstย  the AGF over N242bnย  and $1.3bn import duties and withholding tax assessments. The telecommunications company, in the suit instituted by a writ, had challenged the legality of the AGFโ€™s assessment of import duties, withholding tax and value added tax amounting toย  N242bn and $1.3bn. At the Wednesday proceedings, counsel for the AGF, Tolu Mokolu, told the court that their witnessย  could not appearย  in court as he had some challengesย  in Abuja. Mokolu also said the lead counsel, Tijani Gazali, was also held up in Abuja,ย  urgingย  the court to grant an adjournment. Counsel for the telecoms firm, Wole Olanipekun (SAN), said neither wouldย  he opposeย  the requestย  norย  ask for cost. ย Justice Chukwukekwu Anekeย  then adjourned the case till October 29, 31 for trial. In a statementย  on Wednesday, MTNย  said it hadย  faithย  in the Nigerian court system and was ready to present its case whenever the opportunity arose. The companyย  insisted that it was in โ€œfull compliance with all extant tax and regulatory obligations. We reiterate our commitment to obeying all Nigerian laws, rules and regulations that govern and guide our business practices.โ€ MTN is seekingย  a declaration that the AGFโ€™s demandย  was premised on a process which was malicious, unreasonable and illegal. It is alsoย  seekingย  a declaratory relief that the purported revenue asset investigationย  carried out by the Federal Governmentย  between 2007 and 2017, and its decision conveyed through the office of the AGF in a letter dated August 20, 2018, violated the provisions of Section 36 of theย  Nigerianย  Constitution. It also sought a declaration that the AGF acted in excess ofย  hisย  powers byย  demandingย  payment of import duties on the importation of physical goods. The companyย  wantsย  a declaration that the AGF acted illegally by usurping the powers of the Federal Inland Revenue Service to audit and demand the remittance of withholding tax and value added tax and declaration that the purported self-assessment exercise instituted by the AGF via aย  letter dated May 10, 2018, is unknown to law, null and void and of no effect whatsoever.   Source: Punch

Absence of witness stalls MTNโ€™s tax suit against AGF Read More ยป

We realised N93bn from VAIDS, N66bn paid up โ€“ FIRS

The Chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), Babatunde Fowler, has said the Voluntary Assets and Income Declaration Scheme (VAIDS) generated N93 billion at the end of the exercise. Fowler, who disclosed this while speaking with Daily Trust, yesterday on the side-line of an official assignment in Lagos, said: โ€œWe realised a little over N93 billion. Out of which about N66 billion has been paid. It also helped increase the numbers of tax payers in the country.โ€ Speaking on the next line of action, Fowler said, part of the conditions was that those believed to have been honest in their dealings will not require further audit. He said a few others did not provide sufficient information and the service had contacted them to bring forward more information failure of which will lead the FIRS to take the normal cause of action. Fowler further disclosed that in the last two years, FIRS had a 100 per cent increase in terms of the number of tax payers: from 10 million to 20 million. โ€œWe already have machinery in place right now and we believe that if we get the required cooperation, that number should go to 45 million before the end of July,โ€ he added. He said FIRS is set to launch the new Tax Identification Number process. โ€œWe call it a new TIN (TAX identification number) registration process. That is going to be launched by the vice president, Yemi Osinbajo, on the first of July. Prior to now, we have people undergoing training on how to utilise it. โ€œWhat this system basically does is that, it takes the information already in a system plus what we have in our national tax data base. Once launched, we have one tax data base for the whole nation, both for corporates and individuals. โ€œWhat that implies is that, if you have a tax clearance in Kano State and you are coming to Lagos for a transaction, instead of the man in Lagos confirming your physical tax clearance paper, he just hits a button and your tax history will show life,โ€ Fowler stated. He further noted that the system also helps with the capacity to capture biometrics from individualsโ€™ BVN or those captured from the Corporate Affairs Commission. He argued that the benefit will be convenient and transparency. โ€œIf you have a resident who goes to transact business in another state, immediately, your tax position is shown. If you are going to bid for a government contract in line with the law, part of the criteria is to have a tax clearance certificate,โ€ he added. He disclosed that the information from the data base will be made available to all revenue collection agencies and government agencies where one has to transact business and it will improve revenue generation. โ€œEven for politicians, they require tax certificate. So INEC will have access to it and can tell if the politicians have tax certificate,โ€ he also said. Speaking on meeting the N8 trillion target for 2019, he said โ€œAs at today, we are on course, but our high months of collection are June, July, August and September.   Source: Daily Trust ย 

We realised N93bn from VAIDS, N66bn paid up โ€“ FIRS Read More ยป

From July, you will start paying VAT for stock exchange transactions

Investors and dealing members will begin to pay value-added tax for transactions carried out on the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE). This is due to the expiration of the Value-Added Tax (Exemption of Commissions on Stock Exchange Transactions) Order of 2014. During her tenure as coordinating minister for the economy and minister of finance, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala had exempted VAT deductions from commissions earned on the traded value of shares, commissions payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission, commissions payable to the Nigerian Stock Exchange and commissions payable to the Central Securities Clearing System. At the time, Okonjo-Iweala said the purpose of the exemption was to encourage investments in the Nigerian capital market. VAT is a type of consumption tax placed on a product at every stage of processing/value addition. The cost is usually paid by the consumer. The order, which was a result of the powers conferred on the minister of finance in section 38 of the Value Added Tax (VAT) Act, was to be effective for five years. The section of the act empowers the minister to amend the rate of tax chargeable; and amend, vary or modify the list of exempted goods and services set out in the first schedule to the act. The five-year period lapses on July 25. Except there is an order from the ministry of finance extending the exemption, transactions carried out on the stock exchange will be eligible for VAT deductions. In an interview on Tuesday, Zainab Ahmed, former minister of finance, said the federal government has plans to raise VAT from the current 5% to 7.5% by 2020.   Source: The cable

From July, you will start paying VAT for stock exchange transactions Read More ยป

Fg increase VAT by 2020 ex finance minister.

Mrs Zainab Ahmed, former minister of finance, says the federal govt is planning to increase VAT from the current five percent to 7.5 percent by 2020 – The development comes amidst reports that the government is seeking to shore up falling revenue – Ahmed said the government had developed a strategic revenue growth initiative which was being implemented. The federal government is planning to increase the rate of value-added tax to 7.5 percent from the current five percent by 2020, says the former finance minister, Mrs Zainab Ahmed. The ex minister made the disclosure on Tuesday, June 25 at the Bloomberg Emerging & Frontier Forum in London, ThisDay reports. The development comes as Bloomberg reported that the government is seeking to shore up falling revenue. Nigerians had previously opposed earlier plans by the federal government to increase VAT. Ahmed, whose tenure ended with President Muhammadu Buhariโ€™s first term on May 29, said that her main preoccupation while in office was how to raise governmentโ€™s revenue with only 55 percent of targets being met. She said: โ€œWe have developed a strategic revenue growth initiative, which we have started to implement. โ€œOur target is to increase revenue to 65 percent minimum in 2019 so that in the next three years we are able to attain 80-85 percent of our revenue target.โ€ Recall that Legit.ng previously reported that the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) on Wednesday, March 20, refuted reports of a planned increment of Value Added Tax (VAT) by 50 percent to meet up payment of the newly proposed minimum wage. The head, Communication and Servicom Department, Wahab Gbadamosi, made this known in a statement in Abuja. He said that contrary to reports in the media, the FIRS chairman called for a reduction in Companies Income Tax (CIT) rate for small businesses so as to improve compliance.   Source: Legit

Fg increase VAT by 2020 ex finance minister. Read More ยป

Deadline For Filing Income Tax And Transfer Pricing Returns

The deadline for filing of income tax and transfer pricing (TP) returns with Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) is fast approaching for corporate taxpayers whose financial year-end is 31 December. The Companies Income Tax Act (CITA) and Income Tax (Transfer Pricing) Regulations 2018 (the TP Regulations) require corporate taxpayers to file annual companies income tax (CIT) and TP returns within six (6) months after their financial year-end (i.e., due date for filing). Failure to do so attracts administrative penalties. While the penalty for failure to file CIT returns on the due date is โ‚ฆ25,000 for the first month of default and โ‚ฆ5,000 for each subsequent month, the penalties for failure to file TP returns on the due date have been revised upward as follows: Failure to file the TP declaration form (if applicable) within the stipulated time attracts a penalty of โ‚ฆ10 million for the first month of default and โ‚ฆ10,000 for every day the failure continues. Failure to file the TP disclosure form within the stipulated time attracts a penalty of โ‚ฆ10 million or 1% of the value of the controlled transaction(s), whichever is higher, for the first month of default and โ‚ฆ10,000 for every day the failure continues. CITA and the TP Regulations allow taxpayers to apply for an extension of the due date for filing of their CIT and TP returns, respectively, where they are unable to meet such due date. While taxpayers are only required to show good cause when applying for an extension of the due date to file TP returns, taxpayers are required to meet certain stringent conditions when making an application for extension of the due date to file CIT returns. However, it should be noted that the grant of extension of the filing date is solely at the discretion of FIRS. In view of the above, taxpayers are advised to ensure that their CIT and TP returns are filed at their respective tax offices on or before 28 June 2019 in order to avoid the administrative penalties.   Source: Mondaq

Deadline For Filing Income Tax And Transfer Pricing Returns Read More ยป

Loading...