Tobi Aminu

Tax: Why FIRS boss Babatunde Fowler was queried

The Executive Chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), Mr. Babatunde Fowler, was queried by President Muhammadu Buhari over variances between budgeted collections and actual collections between 2015 and 2018. Multiple presidency sources confirmed the authenticity of the query dated August 8, 2019, and signed by the Chief of Staff to the President, Malam Abba Kyari. โ€œWe have observed significant variances between the budgeted collections and actual collections for the period 2015 to 2018. Accordingly, you are kindly invited to submit a comprehensive variance analysis explaining the reasons for the variances between budgeted and actual collections for each main tax item for each of the years 2015to 2018. โ€œFurthermore, we observe that the actual collections for the period 2015 to 2017 were significantly worse than what was collected between 2012 and 2014. Accordingly, you are kindly invited to explain the reasons for the poor collections. โ€ Newsmen report that the FIRS boss was appointed by President Buhari on August 18, 2015. His appointment was confirmed by the Senate on Wednesday, December 9 of the same year. But one of the sources expressed shock as to how the query was leaked to the press, blaming โ€œFowlerโ€™s enemiesโ€ in the system. The source, who does not want to be named, said: โ€œWe donโ€™t know how the letter got to the press. Maybe people who donโ€™t like the chairman leaked it. But it is true that the letter was indeed written by the Chief of Staff on behalf of the President. โ€œAs you have seen from the content, it is not a query per se. It is just a request for explanation. The request is itself based on the information supplied to the Presidency by the chairman (Fowler) himself,โ€ he said. He said Fowler was asked to come forward with the revenue collection over a ten -year period. โ€œFrom 2010 to 2014, the FIRS surpassed its targets for each year. From 2015 to date, the FIRS failed to meet its targets every year. So, the idea of the letter is for him to explain the situation as raised by the records he presented. Itโ€™s for him to speak, not the Presidency,โ€ the source said. Another source, who also confirmed the query, said the response of the FIRS boss was being expected today. โ€œYou know President Buhari is all out to leave behind a legacy at the end of his tenure come 2023 and he needs funds to execute his programmes and policies. It is against this backdrop that the FIRS boss was queried,โ€ the source said, saying he should not be named. Newsmen report that the query is being seen as a signal that Fowlerโ€™s tenure may not be renewed. In the years under review, the actual amount collected under Fowler as tax fell below the budgeted target and also low when compared with what was received before he became the chief executive of FIRS. In 2015, the actual collection was put at N3.7tn, while the budgeted target was N4.5tn. A similar shortfall occurred in 2016, when actual collection was N3.307tn, less than the N4.95tn budgeted target. Also, in 2017, the FIRS collected a total of N4.027tn, less than the set target of N4.89tn. In 2018, actual collection was N5.32tn, while the budgeted target was N6.7tn. The FIRS is responsible for assessing, collecting and accounting for tax and other revenues accruing to the Federal Government. In 2007, FIRS got financial and administrative autonomy with the passage of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (establishment) Act 2007. A staff of the FIRS told newsmen last night that there were so many petitions against Fowler. The staff, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said he also saw the query issued by the presidency. โ€œThough I cannot confirm its authenticity, I know very well that there are many petitions against Mr Fowler written by both insiders and people watching happenings in the establishment from outside,โ€ he said. โ€œHowever, if the query circulating in the social media is true, I want to believe that the presidency only touched on one aspect. There is heightened grumbling within FIRS on staff welfare and entitlements. โ€œThere is also disaffection about budgeted allowances for staff that supposed to go on training but only privileged few are allowed to go over the years. โ€œMany of us have been listed for certain mandatory trainings over the years but were not granted permission to go. And most importantly, though many FIRS offices have been opened across the country, they are not operating optimally,โ€ he said. The 63-year old Fowler, who is a tax administrator, had served as the Executive Chairman Lagos State Board of Internal Revenue. Efforts to get reaction from the Head of Communications and Servicom Department, Wahab Gadamosi, were not successful as his phone lines were not reachable up to the time of filing this report.   Source: Today.ng

Tax: Why FIRS boss Babatunde Fowler was queried Read More ยป

Pay tax, end poverty in Oyo โ€”Makinde

The Oyo State Governor, Mr Seyi Makinde, has pleaded for the support of different stakeholders operating in the state on adequate deductions, prompt remittance of taxes and other levies to fulfil his promises on provision of social amenities, enduring infrastructure, regular payment of government obligations and other amenities. Makinde stated this during a one-day sensitisation workshop on computations, deductions and remittances for Federal and State Ministries, Departments and Agencies as well as tertiary institutions in the state held at the House of Chiefs, Secretariats, Ibadan. The governor, who was represented by the Executive Chairman, Oyo State Internal Revenue Service, Mr John Adeleke, reiterated that the intention of the present administration was not going to overburden any business enterprise but would ensure government gets its โ€œfair share of eligible tax revenue.โ€ Makinde said, โ€œPresently, the fluctuations and other complex gyrations of the international oil market and the global economy means unstable and often lower revenue from federal allocation. โ€œThe need to look inward to generate enough internal revenue to cater for the much societal demand has never been this much. We count on companies and other businesses to ensure they regularly deduct and remit their employeesโ€™ PAYE tax to our treasury. โ€œThis will ensure mutual reciprocation of right and duties on the part of all parties. I regard such complying institutions, business and contractors as friends of my government and corporate citizens of this state of enduring opportunities.โ€   Source: Punch

Pay tax, end poverty in Oyo โ€”Makinde Read More ยป

Fowler Gets Monday Deadline To Explain Discrepancies In Tax Collections

President Muhammadu Buhari has given the Executive Chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) Babatunde Fowler till Monday to explain the gaps in tax collections between 2015 and 2018. ย Fowler, whose top echelon of his FIRS has in recent times, been under the searchlight of the Economic and Financial Crime Commission (EFCC) for duty tour allowance (DTA) is expected to explain the discrepancies between the budgeted collections and the actual for the period under review. In a letter signed by Chief of staff to the president, Abba Kyari to Fowler whose tenure expires Saturday, the presidency noted significant variances between budgeted FIRS Collections and Actual Collections for Period 2015 to 2018. โ€œAccordingly, you are kindly invited to submit a comprehensive variance analysis explaining the reasons for the discrepancies between budgeted and Actual collections for each main Tax item for each of the years 2015 to 2018. The FIRS Chairman was also queried over Actual Collections for Periods 2015 to 2017 as it was โ€˜Significantly Worseโ€™ than what was collected between 2012 and 2014. โ€œFurthermore, we observed that the actual collections for the period 2015 to 2017 were significantly worse than what was collected between 2012 and 2014. He was accordingly, invited to give detailed explanations on the reasons for the poor collections during the periods under consideration.   Source: Inside business

Fowler Gets Monday Deadline To Explain Discrepancies In Tax Collections Read More ยป

Buhariโ€™s COS queries FIRS chairman over worsening tax collection

Indications emerged on Sunday that the Chief of Staff to President Muhammadu Buhari, Mr. Abba Kyari, has queried the Executive Chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service, Mr, Babatunde Fowler, over alleged discrepancies in tax collections from 2015 to 2018. A letter dated August 8, 2019, and addressed to the FIRS chairman, which was signed by Kyari, asked Fowler to explain reasons for โ€˜significantโ€™ variances in budgeted collections and actual collections of tax in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018. In the concerned years, the actual amount collected as tax fell below the budgeted target. In 2015, actual collection was N3.7tn, while the budgeted target was N4.5tn. A similar shortfall occurred in 2016, when actual collection was N3.307tn, less than the N4.95tn budgeted target. Also, in 2017, the FIRS collected a total of N4.027tn, less than the set target of N4.89tn. In 2018, actual collection was N5.32tn, while the budgeted target was N6.7tn. Fowler was appointed chairman of the FIRS in August 2015, but his appointment was confirmed by the Senate in December of the same year. The query covers the period he has been in office. His tenure is expected to expire at the end of August, going by the date he was appointed, although there are also suggestions that the expiry date could be December, the month his appointment was confirmed.   Source: Punch

Buhariโ€™s COS queries FIRS chairman over worsening tax collection Read More ยป

NBR to introduce app to check tax evasion

The National Board of Revenue (NBR) has taken an initiative to introduce a mobile application and software, aiming to check cases of tax evasion and increase the number of taxpayers. The revenue-collecting authority thinks launching of the app and software will bring dynamism into the revenue administration, and help bring a large number of eligible taxpayers under the tax net, an NBR senior official told the news agency. According to the existing income tax law, any business entity and service-providing person must hang the taxpayer identification number (TIN) in their offices or business organisations. But it is not practised properly, which causes confusion as to whether the business or service-provider have their TINs or not. โ€œThatโ€™s why NBR is planning to make it mandatory to hang tax payment certificate,โ€ said the official. He said using the software, all 649 tax circles will be linked to the mobile app. Through this app, anyone will be able to check whether the tax payment certificate is genuine or effective, or an expired one. โ€œWith the app, it will even be possible to lodge complaints with the respective tax circle,โ€ he said. The NBR official hoped when businessmen see customers checking whether they have paid taxes or not, they will feel obliged to pay their taxes. โ€œAs a result, revenue collection will increase and tax evasion cases will come down,โ€ he said. Through the app, it would be possible to check the status of tax payment and the certificate will automatically be cancelled in absence of regular payment. Ineffective certificate means the particular person or organisation does not pay tax. โ€œThereโ€™s no need to provide extra information in this regard,โ€ the NBR official said. He also mentioned that NBR is trying hard to increase the number of taxpayers to one crore within the next two years. As part of the initiative, a tax survey has started. โ€œEnhancing capability in technology will help us bring more dynamism into tax administration,โ€ the official said.   Source: The Daily Star

NBR to introduce app to check tax evasion Read More ยป

Apple to fight $14 billion tax battle in European court next month

Apple is heading to court next month to fight a 13 billion euro ($14.4 billion) tax bill handed down by the European Union in 2016. Europe’s General Court will hear Apple’s appeal on Sept. 17 and 18, Bloomberg reported Friday. The case relates to the bill that the EU Competition Commission ordered Ireland to recoup in August 2016. The commission asserted that the tech giant had an unfair advantage that allowed it pay less tax than it should in Ireland, where its EU headquarters are located. ย Apple CEO Tim Cook denounced the tax bill as “political crap” and vowed to appeal. The US government tried, but failed, to intervene. Ireland, which has a tax system that attracts many US tech companies to its shores, also disagrees with the EU’s decision and will argue alongside Apple in court. Apple has already started repaying some of the money the EU says it owes. The money is currently in an escrow account. The company didn’t respond to a request for comment. The case is one of several current appeals against Europe’s tax decisions related to multinational companies. A spokeswoman for the Competition Commission declined to comment.   Source: Cnet

Apple to fight $14 billion tax battle in European court next month Read More ยป

Give start-ups five-year tax holiday โ€“ Don

The Director, Entrepreneurship and Skills Development Centre at the University of Lagos, Prof Sunday Adebisi, has urged the Federal Government to give start-ups a five-year tax holiday to enable them to survive. He gave this advice on Thursday while presenting a paper titled, โ€˜Entrepreneurship Mindset, a Solution to the Unemployment Rate in Nigeriaโ€™, during the Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industryโ€™s annual entrepreneurship summit. โ€œThere should be a five-year tax holiday for start-ups to allow them to grow and survive,โ€ he stated. ย Speaking during the event with the theme, โ€˜Youth Entrepreneurship and National Developmentโ€™, Adebisi lamented the high rate of unemployment in Nigeria and stressed that entrepreneurship was the only solution to the trend. He also noted that most of the youths that engaged in kidnapping were the ones that had graduated from school where they were taught logic and science and were applying the knowledge of what they had learned to crime. He called them โ€œeducated and smart criminals.โ€ Adebisi advised young people to identify needs in the society that they could provide solution to. He said, โ€œIf you create a solution to a problem, somebody will be willing to pay for it. All the problems in Europe have been solved but the ones in Nigeria have not been solved. That is why today, for instance, there are people making millions of dollars through their investment in malaria drugs.โ€ Also speaking, the Chief Operating Officer, A-Mobile, Damilola Oloruntade, said she moved from Europe where she had gone to seek greener pastures back to Nigeria, adding that she decided to invest in sanitation business because of its huge opportunity. She urged the youths to explore opportunities in the Nigerian environment instead of seeking to go out. According to her, refuse litters everywhere and has become big business in Nigeria. She said, โ€œThere is plenty of money in dirt. Now, we have moved from picking dirt to recycling and this is the business I started with N25,000. We also have increased the number of people we employ from five to 100.โ€ The President, LCCI, Babatunde Ruwase, said the programme was organised to create awareness among the youths about the essence of entrepreneurship. ย โ€œIt is a way to go, particularly these days where there are little opportunities of getting jobs. They can develop skills, come up with ideas and employ themselves and others,โ€ he stated.   Source: Punch

Give start-ups five-year tax holiday โ€“ Don Read More ยป

Time for Online Companies to Pay Tax In Africa

Online companies like Facebook, Google and Netflixย  have managed to have an edge over how business is done and Africa has been getting the short end of the stick. Is it now time to create an even playing field that gives traditional businesses a chance? In November last year, South Africa broadened its value added tax (VAT)ย  base by including all electronic services that are supplied to the South African market. France has also just passed digital services tax targeted at Silicon Valley. Is it time that African governments consider revamping their tax systems to accommodate for the evolution in modern commerce? In Nigeria, companies such as Jumia, Flutterwave, Andela, and Cowrywise have pretty much grown and shaped the digital landscape away from the taxmanโ€™s radar. This is not for long though. The Chairman of Nigeriaโ€™s Federal Inland Revenue Service confirmed this in an interview with Premium Times Newspaper in which he revealed that the country is currently working on a solution for taxing the digital economy. As it stands today, most large technology companies have to pay tax in countries in which they operate due to lack of any physical presence. Therefore, companies such as Netflix do not pay tax the same way a company that offers a similar service physically such Multichoiceโ€™s DSTV does. In his maiden budget presentation in November last year, Zimbabweโ€™s Finance Minister brought up the issue. In his statement, he proposed to extend the scope of revenues deemed to be from a source in Zimbabwe for tax purposes to include amounts received by or on behalf of a radio or television broadcaster domiciled outside Zimbabwe or an electronic commerce operator domiciled outside Zimbabwe.โ€ Such a move was seen as a direct target to companies such as Netflix and Youtube which are becoming increasingly popular alternatives to traditional broadcasters. Nigeria has tried in previous years to ask local partners to withhold tax on revenues that are paid to non-resident companies. However, they met resistance due to the lack of clarity within the legislation. Considering that most of the payments are paid electronically, the cost and means of administering such a tax will be relatively efficient. The tax authority may lay the burden on banks to withhold the portion of the tax that is owed to the government. This will not need foreign companies to then remit payments made from Zimbabwe as it has already been deducted the moment the transaction is effected. Whilst most European countries have seamlessly adjusted their tax systems to include VAT for sales made online, most if not all African countries are still lagging behind. Therefore, one can buy goods through a platform such as Ali-Express without having to pay the same VAT they would have been subjected to if it was from a local company. Is it an unfair tax or levy? Companies that also offer services such as advertising do also pay VAT which a local services company may have to pay in the country in which they are based. This then puts them at a disadvantage compared to their foreign counterparts selling the same product or service. It favours expanding a foreign economy more than local companies. See Also: Facebook Introduces Local Language Coverage to Combat Fake News in Africa Paul Martin, UK head of retail at KPMG, said: โ€œThe digital services taxโ€‰.โ€‰.โ€‰.โ€‰holds the greatest potential to rewrite how the retail game is played. Online marketplaces have often been able to rise above the problems faced by traditional legacy players or independents.โ€ Do African countries have the muscle to enforce the tax against online companies? The Trump administration has responded to Franceโ€™s introduction of the tax levy against online companies with its usual song of tariffs and retaliation. They have promised to make an investigation on whether the tax is discriminatory and restricts American commerce. Whilst it has every right to look at how the tax may harm American commerce, the Americans tend to look the other way about the effects of the actions of online companies on other economies. The small retailer in Harare is already at a disadvantage, the local company in Zimbabwe which is subject to taxes that the U.S. giants are not subject to is not able to compete at the same cost. Dave Lee, BBC North America technology reporter commented on the issue and agrees that the overhaul on the global tax system is now overdue. Whilst France has been left exposed, it is hoping that more countries can be rallied to its cause. EU-wide adoption failed as countries such as Ireland did not come on board as they have managed to lure tech companies to set up their European bases in the country. However, it is not every country that has had this advantage. A move by a powerhouse such as France offers hope for African countries who are looking to move in the same direction. It can be the opportunity to bring the issue for discussion on a global scale and allow both sides of the aisle to find a consensus.   Source: Dey there

Time for Online Companies to Pay Tax In Africa Read More ยป

EU directive on administrative cooperation in field of taxation amended

Introduction The European Union has added further impetus to its objective of providing greater transparency with regard to harmful tax practices through an amendment to EU Directive 2011/16/EU. The amendment builds on the Common Reporting Standard, which allows for the automatic exchange of information on financial accounts held by non-tax residents at an international level and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting project. In brief, EU Directive 2011/16/EU has the introduced the mandatory reporting of cross-border arrangements that are indicative of potentially aggressive tax planning. The relevant disclosure requirements must be followed by intermediaries and, in some instances, taxpayers. Hallmarks. One of the directive’s key points is that it provides no definition of ‘aggressive tax planning’. Instead, taxpayers must adhere to the list of hallmarks found in Annex IV of EU Directive 2011/16/EU, which include general and specific features that are deemed potential indicators of tax avoidance or abuse. Alongside broadly drafted key definitions (eg, ‘intermediary’ and ‘cross-border arrangement’), the hallmarks appear to give the directive a broad scope. The reason given for this is that the intricacies and complexity of aggressive tax-planning arrangements are constantly evolving and modified in response to countermeasures from tax authorities. Under EU Directive 2011/16/EU, a ‘cross-border arrangement’ is an arrangement that concerns more than one EU member state or an EU member state and a country outside the European Union. In a similarly broad fashion, an ‘intermediary’ is anyone who has (or could be reasonably expected to have) knowledge of (or who directly or indirectly aids or offers advice regarding) the design, marketing, organisation, offer or management of a reportable cross-border arrangement. However, a waiver may be issued by an EU member state where the reporting obligation would breach legal professional privilege under the national law of that country. The various hallmarks appear to have been introduced to provide expansive powers of scrutiny. Generic hallmarks under Category A of the directive, specific hallmarks under Category B and certain hallmarks in Paragraph 1 of Category C are subject to the ‘main benefit test’. These hallmarks can be considered only if it is established that the principal benefit or one of the main benefits of an arrangement is to obtain a tax advantage. However, other sections, such as Section D concerning the exchange of information and beneficial ownership, are not subject to the ‘main benefit test’ and make it possible for arrangements that may undermine reporting obligations under the laws implementing EU legislation or any equivalent agreements on the automatic exchange of financial accounting information, including agreements with third countries to be under the purview of mandatory reporting. Category E encompasses specific hallmarks concerning transfer pricing.   Source: International Law Office

EU directive on administrative cooperation in field of taxation amended Read More ยป

FIRS Public Notice On Deduction At Source of WHT And VAT On Compensation Paid By Principal Companies

The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) issued a Public Notice today, 14 August 2019, directing taxpayers, particularly companies in the Fast Moving Consumer Goods sector, to deduct and remit withholding tax and value added tax on the โ€œcompensationโ€ due to their distributors, dealers and agents.ย  The FIRS defines โ€œcompensationโ€ to include commission, rebates, etc., granted in the form of cash, credit note or goods-in-trade. ย The FIRS claimed, in its Public Notice, that some companies have not been complying with the provisions of the Companies Income Tax (Rates, etc. Deduction at Source (Withholding Tax) Regulations S.1 10 1997 (sic) and Paragraph 3.8 of its Information Circular No. 2006/02 of February 2006. ย The FIRS, therefore, noted that it would commence monitoring of compliance with its directive by relevant companies.   Source: Proshare

FIRS Public Notice On Deduction At Source of WHT And VAT On Compensation Paid By Principal Companies Read More ยป

Loading...