October 17, 2019

Don’t evade tax, Cross River warns low income earners

Residents of Cross River State, particularly low income earners, have been warned not to evade paying their taxes. The Speaker of the state House of Assembly, Eteng Williams, gave the warning in Calabar during a tax enlightenment town hall meeting organised by the Cross River State Internal Revenue Service as part of its sensitisation and enlightenment of tax payers on voluntary tax compliance.  Williams said for any low income earner to be exempted from the tax net, the executive arm of government would forward a list of those who qualified for exemption to the Assembly and then pay for them as the law did not allow tax exemption. “What the law actually says is that at the beginning of a tax year, which is before the appropriation is passed, we have to write to His Excellency to give us (the Assembly) the list of those to be exempted. “Tax is compulsory, which means the government must pay for those people. If the government does not pay, then they have not been exempted. You cannot exempt yourself from tax because it is against the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria,” he said. “If the Cross River State Government is willing to pay for them, then they will be exempted, particularly the low income earners. When government categorises those who are low income earners and then gives us the list of these people, then they will be exempted and we will collect the money from government. “Everybody must pay their taxes. If you are being exempted, you have to tell the government to pay for you because when someone asks you to present your tax clearance certificate and you don’t, then it’s against the constitution. Any law that is in conflict with the constitution is null and void.”   Source: Punch

Don’t evade tax, Cross River warns low income earners Read More »

NCWS wants CAC to create gender desk

The National Council for Women Societies (NCWS) has appealed to the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) to create a gender desk that will collate information specifically targeted at women’s empowerment. National president of the council, Mrs Gloria Shoda, made the appeal when members of the council visited the acting Registrar of CAC, Ms Azuka Azinge in Abuja, Wednesday. She said the desk will assist in raising awareness and educate women on the benefits of formalising their small businesses and all opportunities available in registering such ventures with CAC.   She said “a gender desk in CAC will help to collate information, specifically targeted at women’s empowerment. Research shows that women outnumber men in business start-ups.  “However, there are structural obstacles which women face in the society in general, such as gender discrimination in access to opportunities for expansion, skill-acquisition, training and credit facilities.” Shoda added that the NCWS had the capacity to reach out and educate women, especially in rural areas on what CAC had to offer in terms of business and enterprise environment that would be beneficial to the women. She stressed the need for unemployed persons, especially women, to venture into business enterprises, as well as register with CAC to enable them to have access to loans, grants and other benefits that would aid their businesses.  “Therefore, the growth and expansion of the Small and Medium-scale Enterprises (SMEs) sector, as well as the importance of registering a business name cannot be over-emphasised for the womenfolk. “The benefits are immense, including having access to grants, credit facilities and benefitting from government-backed schemes, exhibitions and training initiatives.  The council president commended CAC for reducing the fees for business name registration by 50 per cent for a period of two months and appealed to the commission to extend the grace period to enable women, especially in rural areas, to benefit from it.  Acting Registrar of CAC, Azinge assured NCWS that the agency would continue to support and encourage the growth of businesses and provide enabling environment for them to thrive. Azinge also assured that the commission would look into the issue of extending business name registration to enable women, especially in rural areas to benefit from the cost reduction of business names registration.   Source: Blueprint

NCWS wants CAC to create gender desk Read More »

Better to Boost Revenue By Raising VAT than Borrowing

The Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Mr. Godwin Emefiele yesterday justified the proposed move by the federal government to increase the value added tax (VAT), which is currently at 5 per cent to 7.5 per cent. He said the government was apparently left with no other option than to raise taxes to meet its obligations- amidst criticisms over the country’s rising debt profile as well as the burden to service such debts.  The CBN governor also assured Nigerians that the planned nationwide implementation of the cash policy scheduled for March 2020 would be of immense benefits to the people and the country in general. Addressing journalists at the end of the two-day meeting of the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC), Emefiele said government’s current drive to increase VAT had the potential to improve fiscal revenue to support expenditure and reduce the budget deficit as well as government borrowing, when implemented.  Notwithstanding public outcry over the proposed increase, the MPC noted that the rate of VAT increase “was too little to close the gap in government finances.” Accordingly, the MPC urged the government to, as a matter of urgency, adopt what it termed a ‘Big Bang’ approach towards building fiscal buffers by purposefully freeing-up redundant public assets through an efficient, effective and transparent privatisation process. This, according to the committee, would raise significant revenue for government and resuscitate the redundant assets to generate employment and contribute effectively to national economic growth.  The MPC further noted the unstable oil prices, its implications on accretion to external reserves and its persistent call on the government to build fiscal buffers.  Consequently, the Committee urged the National Assembly to exercise restraint from increasing the oil price budget benchmark to avoid budgetary overruns at the implementation stage of the budget.  It noted that projections from the oil futures market indicate that oil prices will remain tight around the budget oil price benchmark in the medium term. The apex bank, however, resolved to retain the Monetary Policy Rate (MPR) otherwise known as interest rate at 13.5 per cent. The MPR is the rate at which the CBN lends to the real sector and often determines the cost of borrowing in the economy. It further retained the asymmetric corridor at +200/-500 basis points around the MPR while the Cash Reserve Requirements (CRR) and Liquidity Ratio remained at 22.5 per cent and 30 per cent respectively. Emefiele said the Committee decided by a unanimous vote to hold the MPR and all other policy parameters constant.  According to him, “In its considerations regarding the policy options to adopt, the MPC as usual, felt compelled to review the options of whether to tighten, hold or loosen. “The Committee noted the positive moderation in inflation, though slowly from 11.08 per cent in July to 11.02 per cent in August 2019. Given that this was still above the target range of 6-9 per cent, and considering the pressure on reserve accretion caused by the relatively weak crude oil price, the MPC felt the imperative to tighten.” He added: “On the contrary, the MPC was of the view that doing so in the midst of a fragile growth outlook, would increase the cost of credit, and further contract investment and constrain output growth. “On loosening, the Committee felt that this would result in increased system liquidity and hence, heighten inflationary tendencies in the economy. In particular, the MPC was of the view that loosening would drive growth in consumer credit but without a corresponding adjustment in real sector output.  “The Committee was also convinced that increased liquidity and interest rate moderation would result in exchange rate pressures as money supply rises. “As regards the option to hold, the MPC opined that the option requires a clear understanding of the quantum and timing of liquidity injections into the economy, before deciding on possible adjustments to the stance of monetary policy.  “The Committee was also of the opinion that retaining the current position of policy offers pathways to appraising the effects of the suit of heterodox monetary policy to encourage credit delivery to the real sector, especially in the light of the subsisting implementation of the Loan-to-Deposit Ratio policy.” On the proposed VAT hike, the CBN governor said: “My response here is that the government has a responsibility to fend for everybody. In fending for everybody means it has to spend money to provide infrastructure, roads, airport and different things that will improve the lives of our people. “But there are two ways through which the government can fund this expenditure: It is either it raises revenue or it goes for debt.   You all know that the government has been criticised that the debt stock is too high. You all know that government has been criticised that its debt service ratios are too high.” He further added: “When you say the debt service ratio is too high, it means that your interest rate is too high to revenue and what that also means is that your revenue is small because if your revenue is large, then your debt service ratio should be lower. “Government unfortunately will not have any options if we say government should not borrow- then government must raise revenue. If government must raise revenue and we think that this should be one way through which the government can raise revenue to meet its obligations, I think it calls to a rationale that what we are saying is that it is the right decision to say that government has to increase VAT from 5 per cent to 7.5 per cent.” He further clarified: “Yes, we agree that this may be painful but it is important that we understand that government also has an obligation that it must meet and so it must raise revenue. “And what is this VAT rate? 7.5 per cent: compare the VAT rate in Nigeria to VAT rate in any part of the world. Nigeria’s VAT rate even at 7.5 per cent stands at one-off if not

Better to Boost Revenue By Raising VAT than Borrowing Read More »

Vat: Why It Will Hurt

The federal government recently increased the value added tax (VAT) from 5% to 7.5%.The increase has continued to generate mixed reactions. The organised labour and some economic experts have condemned the move in strong terms and described the increase as untimely, aimed at inflicting more pains on poverty-ravaged Nigerians. The NLC stated that the increase in VAT while government is still negotiating the minimum wage will not augur well for workers. The VAT will end up eating up the much-talked about minimum wage and erode the expected gains that might arise from the implementation. If the VAT is adjusted and assented to by the National Assembly, Nigerians next year are going to pay more for the goods and services they will consume. The Nigerian rent-seeking economy has continued to nosedive due to the uncertainty or volatile nature of the global oil market. The market price of crude oil which constitutes 90 per cent of the country’s revenue has continued to swing up and down, thus affecting the implementation of our budget. This is the main reason why government is exploring other avenues to generate revenue and complement the earning from the crude oil sale. Government has resorted to VAT increase because it’s the quickest way to generate funds. But what is Value added tax (VAT)? A value-added tax is a consumption tax levied on products at every point of sale where value has been added, starting from raw materials and going all the way to the final retail purchase.  VAT is commonly expressed as a percentage of the total cost. For example, if a product costs N100 and there is a 7.5% VAT, the consumer pays N107.5 to the merchants. The merchant keeps N100 and remits N7.5 to the government. The proponents of value added tax make the argument that a VAT system encourages payment of taxes and discourages attempt to avoid them. The fact that VAT is charged at each stage of production rewards tax compliance and acts as a disincentive from operating in the black market. It also helps to generate revenue to the government .The opponents of VAT claim that it unfairly burdens people with lower income. Unlike a progressive tax, a VAT is like a flat tax where all consumers of all income level pay the same percentage, regardless of earnings. The proposed VAT increase will fetch more resources or revenues to the government. I learnt that based on the agreed sharing formula, state governments would get the bulk of resources. State governments are expected to get 50%, local government 35% and the federal government 15%. However, the hue and cry that greeted the news of hike in VAT cannot be unconnected with the high rate of poverty in the country and lack of financial prudence among the states government. Evidence is the inability of some state governors to meet up with the salary obligations of their states in spite of the bailouts dished to them by the federal government.   Source: This day

Vat: Why It Will Hurt Read More »

Illegal Tax deductions: FIRS to refund $2m, others to General Electric

The Federal Government has urged General Electric to refund N360 million and two million dollars excess withholding tax (WHT) deducted from Arco Petrochemicals Engineering Company Limited, through its business dealings with General Electric (GE) International Operations Nigeria.  This was part of outcome of the negotiations between FIRS officials, General Electric, ARCO and the Trade Union Services Department of the Federal Ministry of Labour and Employment in Abuja on Tuesday. The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) recalls that GE, a multinational company operating in Nigeria, had engaged Arco, an indigenous Nigerian oil servicing company, for the supply of local personnel. But Arco in one of its letters dated June 5, 2018, claimed that GE deducted 10 per cent as withholding tax for the contract between 2006 and 2015, against the five per cent stipulated by Nigerian law. The company said the applicable tax rate should be five per cent in line with the FIRS Circular No. 2006/02, dated February 2006. Following the controversial tax remittance disputes between General Electric (GE) and Arco Group Plc, 60 per cent of the worker’s entitlement have not been paid since 2009. An official of the Ministry of Labour and Employment, who pleaded anonymity said, although the Federal Government was not a debt collector, it intervened because ARCO accepted responsibility that they have financial obligation to settle people’s salaries and Union dues. “The ministry is not a debt collection agency, it came into the matter because ARCO accepted its financial obligation for the settlement of salaries and union dues, the company said the only way it could complete the payment is if GE made a refund to it. “We gave them three weeks to begin process of refund for those monies that they have an understanding that they were actually over-payment to FIRS. If there is no contention on that, within one week, GE should initiate the process of refund. “FIRS said they have to go through some processes before they can get cash back to pay. For those that there are contentions, let them try to get their books together and reach an agreement within two weeks. “The unions involved said they have the list of what is due to their members that has not been paid by ARCO. We expect that those reconciliations will be completed and payment will be made.” Mr Amadike Ikechukwu, Branch Chairman, ARCO Petroleum and Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria (PENGASSAN), said ARCO paid field workers 100 per cent of their entitlement but paid only 40 per cent to other categories of staff when their employments were terminated. He said ARCO claimed that it could not complete the payment because the American company, General Electric, deducted 10 per cent withholding tax from workers earnings and paid the sum, which runs into millions of dollars, to FIRS. “As union leaders, we agree with the commitment made by FIRS and GE. We are optimistic that the remaining 60 per cent will be paid to the workers,” he said. (NAN).   Source: The Sun

Illegal Tax deductions: FIRS to refund $2m, others to General Electric Read More »

Loading...