October 3, 2019

‘New VAT rate to boost budget execution’

The Centre for Social Justice on Thursday said the decision of the Federal Government to increase the Value Added Tax from the current rate of five per cent to 7.2 per cent would increase revenue needed to finance the budget. The Lead Director, CSJ, Eze Onyekpere, said this in a statement issued in Abuja. In the statement, he said as a country having one of the lowest tax to Gross Domestic Product ratio, there was a need to increase the tax rate to generate additional revenue. This, he said, was imperative following claims by the Federal Government that the country was facing fiscal crisis. He said, “Centre for Social Justice welcomes the decision of the Federal Government in the proposal for an increase in VAT from the current rate of five to 7.2 per cent.” He added that the new VAT rate would increase available resources for budget implementation and development across the three tiers of government.   Source: Punch

‘New VAT rate to boost budget execution’ Read More »

VAT hike will kill businesses, shrink GDP – Experts

Experts and groups such as the Nigeria Employers’ Consultative Association have said the recent increase in the Value Added Tax rate from five per cent to 7.2 per cent will lead to closure of many businesses. The Head of Tax and Corporate Advisory Services at  PricewaterhouseCoopers, Taiwo Oyedele, said the new VAT rate would shrink the GDP growth and disposable income of Nigerians. The Director-General of NECA, Mr Timothy Olawale, noted that the timing of the increase in VAT rate was wrong, stressing that the government ought to support businesses in reducing the alarming unemployment rate in the country. Recall that the Minister of Finance, Budget and National Planning, Zainab Ahmed, on Wednesday announced the VAT rate increase at the end of the Federal Executive Council meeting. Olawale, however, argued that the benefits of the recently signed national minimum wage of N30,000 would be neutralised by the proposed increase in the VAT, thus further reducing the purchasing power of the citizens. “If this new VAT rate is implemented, the purchasing power of the citizens would have been reduced, sales of goods and services will reduce and inventories for business will be high and could lead to closure of businesses that ought to be supported by government in reducing unemployment rate that is currently alarming.  “Furthermore, the benefits of the recently signed national minimum wage of N30,000 would be neutralised by the proposed increase in the VAT, further reducing the purchasing power of the citizens, leading to increase in prices of goods and services. It will result in upward movement of the inflation rate, and further contraction of the economy.” Olawale who was speaking in Abuja noted that the recently released data of the country’s Gross Domestic Product indicated a contraction in the past two quarters (Q4 2018, 2.38 per cent; Q1 2019, 2.10 per cent and Q2 2019 1.94 per cent). Rather than increase the VAT rate at this point, he said countries should be formulating fiscal policies to stimulate their economies.  “Therefore, this suggests that at this period of time, countries should be formulating fiscal measures/policies to stimulate their economies,” he stated. Olawale, who said that in the event that the government must increase VAT rate against the will of the people, it should have been limited to luxury or ostentatious goods. He also urged the government to double its efforts at expanding the tax net, reduce the income gap and improve the economy through more friendly fiscal policies and promote the ease of doing business in Nigeria. Oyedele of the PwC in a statement on Thursday said more people were likely to evade tax payment as businesses would become less competitive. At the current rate of five per cent, the PwC partner explained that the country’s VAT collection of N1.1tn in 2018 amounted to 0.9 per cent of the GDP compared to about 3.8 per cent for commonwealth and ECOWAS countries. While estimating that the government would earn additional N440bn annually from the two per cent increase in VAT rate, he said for Nigerian businesses, it meant a 40 per cent increase in VAT cost. The tax expert noted that because VAT on capital expenditure was not allowed as a credit in Nigeria, the cost of real investments would go up. On the positive side, Oyedele said, “Additional VAT revenue will help reduce budget deficits, reduce government debt and fund social services especially at sub-national level.” To avoid the negative impact of VAT, he argued that VAT should be paid according to individuals’ ability as not everyone could afford a seven per cent VAT rate. He suggested other palliative measures, saying “exempt or zero rate essential consumptions like foods, education and primary health care. The exemption should not be limited to only unprocessed food items. In other words, a VAT increase should not affect the price of bread.” “Create a VAT registration threshold to eliminate VAT compliance burden for small businesses. Allow businesses to account for VAT on cash basis rather than on invoice, which creates a cash-flow problem. Lead by example; ensure that government and all MDAs fully comply by remitting VAT collected from their contractors. Ensure transparent reporting and efficient utilisation of the revenue for public services and infrastructure.” Reacting to the proposed increase, a former Director-General, the Securities and Exchange Commission, Dr Suleyman Ndanusa, said it would affect demand for goods and services. He said companies would suffer if people did not demand for goods and services because of VAT increase. “If people do not demand for goods because of more tax burden, it will affect the companies that produce them. And if the companies that produce them are not making money, it will obviously affect their profitability and income,” he said. Ndanusa, who spoke to the News Agency of Nigeria, also noted that the timing was wrong, considering the challenges in the economy. “The timing is quite wrong. At this point in time, our economy needs to be helped by policies that will ginger more consumption and more disposable income for the masses. The paradigm for me has to change. Are we increasing tax just for the purpose of revenue or managing our fiscal policy taxation for growth? The paradigm has shifted from revenue-driven taxation to growth-driven taxation,” he said. He added that government needed to introduce incentives, reduce interest rates and pump up consumption to help the economy to grow instead of increasing taxes. “The approach must be holistic, obviously at a time like this when there is a seeming recession or coming out of recession. Government needs to pump up consumption; when you begin to tax expenditure just for the purpose of revenue, it will further dampen demand and affect businesses.”   Source: Punch

VAT hike will kill businesses, shrink GDP – Experts Read More »

Why business name registration is necessary–CAC

The Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) has stated that registration of business names is necessary for both companies and small scale businesses as any enterprises operating without registering with the Commission is liable to be sanctioned. Head of Bauchi State office of the Commission Alhaji Abdullahi Abubakar stated this, Thursday while speaking on the procedure and requirements for registering businesses at Business support clinic program and e-mentoring with mentors and mentees with beneficiaries of digital livelihood training for young women and girls organized by centre for information technology and development (CITAD) with support from equal digital skills fund held in Bauchi. He said it is compulsory for any one using any name for his business enterprises other than his personal name and surname to register it with the Commission adding that offenders risk penalty. According to him, registering the business will also help business men to have monopoly of the business names and get recognition as legal enterprises. The CAC boss noted that the registration costs the sum of  ‘only N10, 000’ Also speaking, the representatives of the National Agency for Food and Drugs Administration and Control (NAFDAC) and Standard Organization of Nigeria (SON) Bashir Musa and Mohammed Chinade explained that after registering with CAC, manufacturers of consumable items should register with NAFDAC while SON registers companies producing both consumable and non consumable items to ensure only quality items are sold to Nigerians. Earlier, the Executive Director of the centre for information technology and development (CITAD) Mr Y.Z Ya’u represented by the technical officer of the centre Kamaluddeen Umar said the training was intended to equip young women with practical ICT training and use its tools that would help them in the ICT industry and to start up micro-enterprises.   Source:  Blue print

Why business name registration is necessary–CAC Read More »

Google to pay €1bn to end French tax probe

Google is to pay French authorities almost €1bn (£900m) to end a long-running investigation into its taxes. The settlement includes a €500m fine and additional taxes of €465m, but it is less than the tax bill authorities had accused Google of evading. It rounds off a four year investigation that saw authorities raid Google’s Paris headquarters in 2016. Investigators said Google owed about €1.6bn in unpaid taxes amid a wider crackdown on tax planning of big firms. French authorities had been seeking to establish whether Google, which has its European headquarters in Dublin, failed to declare some of its activities in the country. The search giant, which is part of Alphabet, pays little tax in most European countries because it reports almost all of its sales in Ireland. It is able to do that thanks to a loophole in international tax law. However, that loophole hinges on staff in Dublin concluding all sales contracts. The agreement allows Google “to settle once for all these past disputes,” said Antonin Levy, one of the firm’s lawyers. In March, the EU hit Google with a €1.5bn fine for blocking rival online search advertisers and last year the European Commission levelled a record €4.3bn fine against the firm over its Android mobile operating system. In January, France fined Google €50m a breach of the EU’s data protection rules.   Source: BBC

Google to pay €1bn to end French tax probe Read More »

VAT Recovery in Nigeria’s Oil Service Sector

Value Added Tax (VAT) is a consumption tax levied at each stage of the supply chain and ultimately borne by the consumers. The tax was introduced in Nigeria in 1993 via the Value Added Tax Act (VATA), after a recommendation by a study group that was set up in 1991 to review the Country’s entire tax system. It is worth knowing that before the introduction of VAT, sales tax was in operation in Nigeria. However, VAT is different from sales tax, as it has a broader scope and includes most supplies, professional services and banking transactions. The Tax is managed by the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) and is charged on the supply of goods and services other than those exempted in the first schedule to the VATA. It operates on a credit mechanism such that each producer along the value chain can claim the tax paid at the previous stage of production, when passing the product of his effort to the consumer at the next stage (provided that the producer and the merchant deal in goods on which the input VAT is claimable). The operation of the credit mechanism, however, stops at the stage where the item is purchased by the final consumer, who bears the full tax burden. In essence, merchants offset the total VAT paid on purchases (called ‘input tax’) in a given period (usually one month), against the total VAT charged on sales (i.e. ‘output tax’) and pay the excess to the FIRS. For companies operating in the oil and gas industry however, the law requires service recipients to withhold the output VAT charged by their vendors and remit it, directly to the FIRS. This requirement of the law has pitched the tax authorities against oil service companies who are legitimately entitled to claim their valid input VAT against the output, before remitting the excess to the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS). In response, the latter has always maintained that the affected companies should file a claim for the refund, for processing and payment. However, there has been some controversies on the process for the recovery of such input VAT, given the provision of the VATA. Thus, this article is focused on breaking the myth of the challenges faced by companies operating in the Nigerian oil and gas sector, in recovering valid input VAT on cost incurred against the output VAT on their supplies. Allowable Input VAT: In 1998, the VAT Act was amended to restrict the scope of allowable input VAT. T through section 6 of the Finance (Miscellaneous Taxation Provisions, Act No. 18, 1998, which introduced section 13(a) (now section 17) of the VAT Act, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria (LFN), 2004). Section 17 of the amended VATA provides that: “………..the input tax to be allowed as a deduction from output tax shall be limited to the tax on goods purchased or imported directly for resale and goods which form the stock-in-trade used for the direct production of any new product on which the output tax is charged”. The provision also excluded the input VAT incurred on overheads, services and general administration of any business from being claimed against a company’s output VAT. Rather, such input VAT should be expended through the company’s profit or loss account. The input VAT on capital items and fixed assets are to be capitalized with the cost of the items. Deduction at Source: VAT charged by a vendor is expected to be paid to it by the service recipient, together with the invoice value for the goods sold or services received. However, section 13(2) of the VATA provides that for companies operating in the oil and gas sector, VAT charged them by their vendors should be deducted at source and remitted directly to the FIRS. This position was further clarified and corroborated by the FIRS via paragraph 13(2) of its information circular .   Source: This days

VAT Recovery in Nigeria’s Oil Service Sector Read More »

Loading...