August 15, 2019

CITN renews vision statement to widen horizon

To widen its corporate horizon, the Chartered Institute of Taxation of Nigeria (CITN), has renewed its vision and mission statement, with the hope to pursue the actualisation of both with more vigour. The body added that it is also planning to be a leading Institute in training world-class tax professionals. It explained that the planned tax academy would be developed to project the fundamental driving force of its vision, while it will engage all stakeholders with an inclusive mind-set and strengthening other capacity building programmes. New CITN President, Dame Gladys Simplice, said this in her address during her investiture as the 14th president of the Institute over the weekend. She said the tax academy will be repositioned in terms of capacity for a technically-driven alternative route to membership through intensive training for revenue services staff. To admit lawyers into the Institute, she said they will go through extended period for pre-induction training to close the knowledge gap in their accounting and taxation. On the international scene, Simplice, who is also the President of the West Africa Union of Tax Institutes (WAUTI), said the Institute will continue to push for inclusiveness and full membership of member states to broaden their horizon and development with the needed expertise in the sub-region. The special guest of honour, Executive Chairman, Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), Babatunde Fowler, said globally, the issue of taxation is already on the front burner where the profession is seen to be of importance than before. While promising his support for the president, Fowler said Nigeria has attained the position where taxation can be recognised as a choice of destination. Lagos State Governor, Babatunde Sanwo-Olu, represented by the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Mrs Balogun, while congratulating Simplice, urged Lagosians to pay their taxes regularly for more infrastructural development in the state. Sanwo-Olu also promised to partner with the institute for development of the state.   Source: Guardian

CITN renews vision statement to widen horizon Read More »

FIRS, MTN disagree over tax/fine status

MTN Nigeria, on Friday, admitted to a technical disagreement between it and the Federal Inland Revenue Service on how the 2015 fine should be treated for tax purposes. Mr Onome Okwah, Manager, Public Relations and Protocol, Corporate Affairs/Corporate Relations, MTN, disclosed this in a statement in Lagos. According to him, the organisation’s attention has been drawn to media reports regarding the status of taxes relating to the 2015 fine imposed on MTN. He, however, added that while the monies had been paid to FIRS, MTN had taken the disagreement to the Tax Tribunal set up by the FIRS Chairman and Minister of Finance and were awaiting its decision. “MTN remains fully compliant with the Nigerian tax laws and will abide by the findings of the tribunal. “The company is committed to meeting its fiscal responsibilities and contributing to the social and economic development of Nigeria. “Since incorporation in 2001, MTN has invested more than N2 trillion in the Nigerian economy and has paid more than N1.7 trillion in taxes, levies and other regulatory fees. The News Agency of Nigeria reports that Mr Babatunde Fowler, Chairman, FIRS, recently accused MTN of deducting tax from the N330 billion fine it paid to the Nigerian Communications Commission. Fowler maintained that fines and penalties for regulatory infractions were revenues paid to the Federal Government and should not be subjected to any tax deduction. NCC had in October 2015 imposed a N1.04 trillion fine on the telecommunications giant for alleged non-compliance with the deadline set by the commission to disconnect all unregistered SIM cards. The regulator reduced the fine to N780 billion in December 2015, having taken into consideration the stability of the telecommunication sector. The fine was further reduced to N330 billion after MTN had agreed to be listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange.   Source: Punch

FIRS, MTN disagree over tax/fine status Read More »

New holiday home tax rules explained

HMRC plans to introduce new rules for taxpayers and intermediaries on cross-border tax planning, and which might affect British residents’ who buy overseas properties. Thinking of buying a holiday home in the Dordogne? The taxman needs to know HMRC plans to introduce new rules for taxpayers and intermediaries on cross-border tax planning, and which might affect British residents’ who buy overseas properties. It is not uncommon for those buying this type of property to be offered alternative ways of holding the asset. If the main benefit is the avoidance of tax the details will need to be reported to HMRC. HMRC acknowledges that one of the primary purposes of their proposals is to refine the requirement to report tax planning where cross-border transactions are involved. The taxman is aware that historically UK residents have acquired overseas assets with undeclared income and have used offshore structures to hide the asset from the tax authorities. HMRC is concerned that unless they are informed at the time of the transaction there is a risk that tax could be lost. HMRC is interested in the source of the funds used to acquire the holiday home, how the maintenance costs are paid, whether the letting of the property generates rental income or whether a capital gain is made when the property is sold. If HMRC is told of the acquisition of the property, this will allow them to consider if there were any concerns with how the taxpayer funded the property and met the running costs. HMRC also wishes to gather information on tax planning solutions offered to taxpayers to judge whether one of the benefits would be the avoidance or evasion of taxes. The government has undertaken to share this information with other EU member states to ensure that cross-border transactions are not used for this purpose. Brits with overseas assets have been under the spotlight since the mid-noughties, as HMRC has continued to target offshore income and gains not previously reported. Starting in January 2016, data was gathered by banks under the OECD’s Common Reporting Standard (CRS) for the automatic exchange of information. This required the participating tax authorities to exchange information with the country in which the account holder was tax resident. HMRC has also cracked down on marketed tax avoidance schemes, and the facilitation of tax evasion by professionals and intermediaries both inside and outside the UK. The government is consulting on new legislation that will require the disclosure of cross-border tax avoidance arrangements. The requirement to report will apply even when the planning is not adopted, all that is necessary is that the promoter has made the planning available to or discussed it with the taxpayer. All parties involved will need to disclose details of the planning, with taxpayers required to report the planning on their personal tax returns. Under the terms of the OECD Directive, the relevant tax authorities will use the information to target tax avoidance and evasion and, where appropriate, share the information with EU member states. The consultation document makes it clear that there may need to be a report made, even where the planning may be in line with and in the spirit of the law. HMRC’s concern is that there is a risk that avoidance or evasion of tax could still be one of the main benefits of the planning.   Source: Legit

New holiday home tax rules explained Read More »

Operators worry over vessel import tax, competition

Many stakeholders in the Nigerian maritime industry are worried about the import tax imposed on new vessels. They say this may put them at a competitive disadvantage among other African countries in a free market. A former Director General of the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency, Mfon Usoro, observes that whereas aircraft brought into Nigeria are registered at zero per cent duty, a shipowner is required to pay 14 per cent of the cost of a new vessel as tax. According to her, this makes people still patronise a temporary importation route because it is cheaper for them than to pay tax and register their vessels in Nigeria. On AfCFTA, Usoro, who spoke at a public lecture recently, said the fear of operators was that of competitiveness. She said, “If you are charging import tax on a Nigerian flagged vessel at 14 per cent of the cost of the vessel and above, South Africa charges zero import tax. “For the Nigerian flagged ship, there is a multiplier effect on everything that is dependent on that trade or vessel. It means the operational cost in South Africa is low; everything is low. So, they cannot compete with Nigeria who is already setting the shipowner up for failure. “So, we are afraid that the business that should come to us will go to other countries that are competitive.” She added, “The point is not about dumping because there are ways we can stop the goods from coming in.  It is competitive pricing. If you want us to buy goods from Nigeria instead of buying from Togo, if your goods are more expensive than those of Togo, why should we buy from you? If your port charges are higher than Togo port charges, how will your goods be competitive?” In addition to this, operators also decry the lack of conducive environment in the maritime sector. The President, Seaports Terminal Operators Association of Nigeria, Mrs Victoria Haastrup, says, “I am suffering; my people are suffering because of the enabling environment that is just not there. “When a ship comes from China, Europe and anywhere in the world, when it berths, you cannot be sure of when it will be able to discharge and go back. And time is of essence to ships. You know what that is costing the importers and the charterers. “In other parts of the world, there is automatic digitisation. Right from the control room, ships are being discharged; you don’t see a single human being. “You sit in your house, log onto the Internet and you can clear your goods without going to the ports. But that cannot happen in Nigeria.” Analysts lament that apart from lack of full automation, the poor condition of roads linking the ports result in trucks spending months on the road trying to access the ports. Stakeholders in the productive sector of the economy had for years reportedly been reluctant to embrace trade pacts that would open the Nigerian market to competition from outside. The high cost of doing business in Nigeria, according to them, is bound to make them vulnerable when pitched against operators in low-cost business environment. Nigeria occupied the 146th position out of 190 countries in the 2018 World Bank Ease of Doing Business rankings. This was even as Ghana, Nigeria’s close neighbour and competitor in the African market, ranked 114, while Cote d’Ivoire ranked 122, Togo ranked 137. Other countries that will compete with Nigeria in the free trade market are Rwanda, which ranked 29; Kenya, 61; Senegal, 141; Egypt, 120; Mozambique, 135 and Jamaica, 75, among others. While reacting to President Muhammadu Buhari’s signing of the pact on July 7, the Director General, Manufacturers Association of Nigeria, Segun Ajayi-Kadir, said, “We shall work together to prevail on the government to do its bit by providing the conducive atmosphere. The infrastructure challenge that constitutes supply constraints should be removed.   Source: Punch

Operators worry over vessel import tax, competition Read More »

VAT payment takes it toll on stock market transactions in Nigeria

In less than a week after the reinstatement of Value-Added Tax (VAT) collection on stock market transactions in Nigeria, reports have shown that investors could pay as much as N2.5 billion yearly in additional costs on trading. The five-year VAT exemption on stock exchange transactions expired on July 24, 2019. Thus, investors and dealing members of the capital market began to pay the tax for transactions carried out on the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) from July 25. The charges are applicable to commissions earned on the traded value of shares; commissions payable to the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC); and commissions payable to the Central Securities Clearing System (CSCS). Based on transaction figures in the past two years, the re-introduced VAT payment would cost traders and dealers an average of N2.49 billion yearly or N207 million monthly, the Nation said, adding that the non-reversal of the tax has taken its toll on transactions immediately.  The addition of VAT to market charges last weekend increased total costs of transactions – on both buy and sell sides – from 3.7 percent as at July 24 to 3.9 percent as of July 25. Consequently, stakeholders in the Nigerian capital market have expressed concerns on the matter. “It will obviously increase transaction costs and make our market more uncompetitive,” the CEO of Sofunix Investment and Communications, Sola Oni, said. “High transaction cost is at variance with global best practices. The policy is (an) overkill at a period when investors’ confidence in the market is still fragile.” With the re-imposition of five percent VAT, commission payable to stockbrokers increased from 1.35 percent per transaction to 1.41 percent; commission payable to the NSE increased from 0.3 percent to 0.315 percent while the commission payable to CSCS increased from 0.36 percent to 0.378 percent. In addition, investors have to pay stamp duty of 0.075 percent on each transaction.  A further breakdown of the total costs per transaction showed that total costs on the buy-side increased from 1.72 percent as of July 24, 2019, to 1.79 percent by July 25, 2019, while total costs on the sell-side increased from 2.02 percent to 2.12 percent. The CSCS, the clearinghouse for the stock market, automatically deducts VAT on commissions payable to it and the NSE while operators use preconfigured software.  However, both bodies only receive commissions on sale transactions while operators charge commissions on both sell and buy transactions. Stamp Duty and VAT on commissions on both sell and buy transactions are further charged by the government. Considering total transactions at the NSE had dropped from N2.543 trillion in 2017 to N2.404 trillion in 2018, capital markets stakeholders have berated the government for what they described as its unconcerned attitude towards the capital market, denouncing the re-imposition of VAT on stock market transactions as “insensitive.”   Source: Ventures Africa

VAT payment takes it toll on stock market transactions in Nigeria Read More »

Loading...