May 9, 2019

CBN, FIRS Differ Over N26.7bn Remittances To Federation Account

The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) have taken opposing positions on revenue remittances by the latter to the Federation Account domiciled with the apex bank. Their disagreement emanates from a shortfall in revenue generated from Petroleum Profit Tax (PPT), Value Added Tax (VAT) and Company Income Tax (CIT), amounting to N26.703billion which the FIRS claimed it remitted to the Federation Account between December 2018 and January 2019. While the FIRS reported that N321.23 billion as total PPT and CIT collections for December 2018 was remitted to the Federation Account with the CBN, the apex bank’s component statement showed that N294.62 billion was received from FIRS during the period. The CBN figure showed a shortfall of N26.61 billion of the amount the FIRS claimed it paid into the account. The document, revealed that FIRS allegedly posted N199.16 billion as total PPT and VAT collections in January 2019 while the CBN component statement to the Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) post-mortem sub-committee indicated that FIRS paid N199.07 billion, which was a shortfall of N90.88 million. The post-mortem sub-committee of FAAC which extensively deliberated upon the reason for the differences between the two agencies could not resolve the matter at its last monthly meeting held at the Board Room of Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Committee (RMFAC) on April 24, 2019. The committee, therefore, directed the two agencies to meet and reconcile their accounts and report back at the next meeting. The meeting was attended by representatives of RMFAC, commissioners of finance and accountants-general from the six geopolitical zones as well as representatives of some revenue generating and accounting agencies.     Source: Leadership

CBN, FIRS Differ Over N26.7bn Remittances To Federation Account Read More »

Does VAT increase portend Yellow Vests?

Nigerian workers always posit that “their take-home pay does not take them home.” Such is the tale of the Nigerian worker – who lives miserly because he earns poorly. The Federal government of Nigeria has now remarkably increased workers’ minimum wage. The government has hinted that it will increase Value Added Tax (VAT) to fund the new wage. This suggests that government has no sufficient funding for national expenses which spurs certain necessary logical inquires: Given that citizens pay taxes to fund public utility, then, what exactly gulps government’s spending? Has Nigeria maximised revenue potentials and why so, if not? Also, should VAT increase? Some countries have revenue problem, some others, have spending problem only. Nigeria has both. Additionally, Nigeria undergoes another third problem of a dangerously accelerating debt profile. Public debt accrues to N24.4trillion, presently. In three years only, external debt soared by $11.77bn at a percentile rate of 114.05 while over 50% of Nigeria’s revenue goes to debt servicing. The reality of a nation having to badly survive on borrowed money speaks volume of an ailing economy. For a stretched epoch, the dominant source of Nigeria’s revenue has been the crude oil. Once, the country accrued significant revenue through agriculture but the crude oil soon displaced it. Inescapably, a need arose to diversify income due to the volatility of oil prices globally. Government implemented tax laws and tax reform policies intermittently. VAT was introduced, FIRS launched electronic tax remittance system, recently, government established the Voluntary Assets and Income Declaration Scheme (VAIDS) through which it purposed to generate USD1 billion by waiving criminal prosecution and other penalties for taxpayers who willingly report undeclared income. Despite the reforms, nothing really has changed. Tax remittance is yet enmeshed in long-drawn-out procedures, tax laws and tax policies are disjointed and cumbersome, there is low tax education as a result, also, multiplicity of taxes and ultimately, revenue is yet low. VAT is charged at 5% presently, a rate which government has argued is low. But given Nigeria’s economic condition, there are no justifications to increase the rate. According to Steve Hanke, Nigeria ranks sixth most miserable country in the world, world poverty clock says more than 91 million Nigerians, close to half of the country’s population, live in extreme poverty and every one minute, six Nigerians become poor. VAT is tax charged on the purchase price of a commodity. With VAT increase, prices of goods and services are bound to soar and such decision would be ill-intended and detrimental. The therapy to the dwindling Nigerian economy is for the country to urgently refashion itself to become a competitive producing economy. Any nation must solve three basic life problems: what to produce, how to produce and for whom to produce. Need for goods and services cannot end. Nations which meet these needs acquire economic strength. During the period of oil boom, Nigeria garnered massive wealth, because it met the oil demand, even though in crude form. Notably, industrialisation fuels production because earth-moving vessels will outdo easily, cheaply and quickly too, what a hundred people will do manually. To gain technical know-how into the workings of complex machines and to be able to build new ones, human capital is essential. This is why qualitative education is non-negotiable for Nigerians. Education should be accessible for all and schooling curriculums should tilt towards technical and technological brainstorming. That way, Nigeria’s vast population would become its fortune. Taxation can even turn in more. strategic coalesce of the numerous tax categories would enhance simplified tax procedures and tax education. The law should also fully have a free course against tax evaders. Much as Nigeria needs revenue boosting, the country needs to be circumspect with spending; and this is a problem with both government and citizens. Enough of depleting foreign reserve by importing $18 million toothpicks yearly or $400 million tomato pastes or ridiculously continuing to import Pizza from the UK. The country has to drop the inglorious notoriety of running an expensive government at the expense of a meteoric debt profile. There is a limit to which any government anywhere in the world may forge ahead with an adverse policy under the guise that implementing such policy is in the best interest of the people. When President Macron of France declared that a climatic policy would inform fuel tax increase, the president’s popularity quickly declined, with citizens finding the tax policy unfavourable. In no time, rowdy crowd wearing Yellow Vets littered France in protest. Raising VAT to fund wage increase is mixed blessing and whether yellow vests or a yellow card, it will elicit a thumbs down from the Nigerian masses that are already bearing the brunt of economic hardship and need rescue.   Source: The Sun

Does VAT increase portend Yellow Vests? Read More »

FG Urged to Raise VAT to 7%

If the country is to reduce unemployment and stimulate economic growth, the federal government has been advised to take bold steps which includes raising the Value Added Tax (VAT). Proshare, an online financial information service hub, stated this in a report titled: ‘Proshare Confidential,’ obtained yesterday.While the report stressed that in times of slow growth, economists would typically not prescribe raising taxes, it stated that since Nigeria currently has the lowest VAT in West Africa at five per cent, the government could be bold to increase the tax by at least 200 basis points, pushing the rate up by two per cent. It noted that if this is implemented, the government should therefore concentrate the additional revenue in infrastructural developments that helps to drop the cost of doing business and citizen transactions to create headroom for consumption which would spur business growth. This, over a period of 36 months, it stated, could reduce the cost of distribution of goods and services, thereby resulting in massive savings in logistics costs which could turn up as major improvements in corporate bottom lines and additional tax income; successfully closing the revenue-expenditure gap. “It’s all about productivity enhancement and not hand-outs to the most vulnerable in the society the way it is done. “You protect the most vulnerable by establishing public safety nets such as unemployment benefits, health services, state subsidised housing etc – all of which has to be paid for from the increase in productivity (translating to tax revenues), plugging of leakages through system/process improvements and adjusting the fiscal regime of taxes of tariffs to spur growth in the short term which will be clawed back to attain near equilibrium (illusory to get an optimum) as progress is attained,” the report stated. In its review of 2019, it described the year as a “watershed for several countries across Africa as they enter election cycles that could make or mar their future.” It pointed out that in Nigeria, the battle for the country’s political and economic soul has become vicious with every arm of government easy fodder for political henchmen determined to keep their paymasters, godfathers and muppets in the business of governance. Unfortunately, this it stated meant that Nigeria’s 2019 federal fiscal plan would be more of a concession to tradition rather than a programme of action to building a resilient economy that can sustain a population growth of 2.9 per cent per annum. It also faulted the federal government’s 2019 Appropriation Bill.   Source: Investors King

FG Urged to Raise VAT to 7% Read More »

Loading...